You're viewing the old website

Free Energy is all about freedom:
Power to the people -- literally and figuratively

 "Free Energy" 

News XML
- PESN Specials
- About
- Pure Energy Blog
- Daily FE News
- Features
- Free Energy Now
- This Week in FE
- Newsletter
- How you can help
- Submit  
- Subscribe


Energy Topics

• Alt Fuels
• Anti-Gravity
• Batteries
• Betavoltaic
• Biofuels
 - BioDiesel
 - BioElectricity
 - Biomass
• Body Electric
• Brown's Gas
• Cold Fusion
• Conservation
• Electrolysis
• Electromagnetic OU
• Fuel Cells
• Fuel Efficiency
 - Electric Vehicles
 - Engines
 - Hydroxy
• Fusion
• Geothermal
• Gravity Motors
• Human Powered
• Hydro
• Hydrogen
• Joe Cells
• Lighting
• Magnet Motors
• Nanotechnology
• Nuclear
• Nucl. Remediation
• Oil
• Piezoelectric
• Plasma
• River
• Salt Water Mix
• Solar
• Solid State Gen.
• Tesla Turbines
• Thermal Electric
• Tidal
• Vortex
• Waste to Energy
• Water
 - Water as Fuel
• Wave
• Wind
• Wireless Electricity
• Zero Point Energy
• MORE . . .

Open Source
• Freddy's Cell
• Bedini SG
• Safe Haven Villages
• MORE . . .

• Awards
• Conservation
• Conspiracy
• Directories
• Investment
• Kudos
• Legal
• Organizations
• Plastic and Energy
• Recycling
• Suppression
• Tools
• Trends
• MORE . . .

• OverUnity Forum
• Employment
• Events
• Humor
• Magazines
• Movies
• Newsletters
• Discuss. Groups

• Store
• Buyer Beware
- - - - - - - - - -
- Donate
- Contact




You are here: > News > August 9, 2015; 8:50 pm MDT

Open Letter: 
Infowars should host Presidential Debates

Infowars would far surpass what any mainstream news organization has been able to do by way of Presidential Debate moderation. They should they limit their debates to five or less candidates who are the most liberty-conscious/supportive and capable of doing a good job, regardless of party ... and in other nations. Survey

Shortcut url: 

David Knight is the most regular host besides Alex on TheAlexJonesChannel 
ACTION: Click on the above image to get an enlarged version, and post it around, linked to

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

About Me

First, let me remind you of who I am. 

Back in 2001, just after the inside job of 9/11, I launched an organization with Joel Skousen to present an alternative to the Socialist World Government being put forth by the New World Order. There is such a thing as world government. The question is not if, but what kind. We formulated some preliminary documents to protect freedom worldwide, in the spirit of the U.S. Constitution, with representative government and the rule of minimal law.

Also during this time, I launched a website to draft Ron Paul into the 2004 Presidential campaign, which he ended up declining; but we did garner several thousand signatures.

I also run which provides religio-political polemic about these end times, and how to avoid WWIII by repenting and turning to God in heaven.

And, of course, I run PES Network, which has been the best exotic free energy news, directory, and networking service on the web since I commenced in 2002. I've been on Coast to Coast AM 8 times talking about free energy. We now have four exotics that have made it to market

Open Letter to Infowars

As I was listening to Infowars host, David Knight talk (Aug 7) about how pathetic the FOX-hosted GOP Presidential debate was, I had a great thought / inspiration.

Infowars has gotten big enough, and strong enough, with enough clout and credibility, I bet you could get a fairly good number of the GOP Presidential Candidate leaders to show up to a debate sponsored by Infowars, hosted by David. I bet you could even do a Democrat primary debate, as well as a general election debate.

David would do a good job. I don't think Alex has as much of the patience needed or composure for something like that -- not as much as David. Alex is more aggressive and divisive. That said, I'm confident Alex could also do a good job. I just think David would do better in that platform.

Ted Cruz would show up; Rand Paul definitely would; as would Carson, most likely; and you'd probably get two or three others. I bet Trump would do it.

The most interesting thing would be to see who is willing to show up. That would say a lot about where they are coming from, itself.

It would show Infowars' leadership, and is likely to go viral, unlike the censored Fox debate. I couldn't find any postings of the whole debate at YouTube. I wasn't able to watch it live.

Then, in 6-months to a year from now, when you do it again, you'd probably get at least half of them to show up.

I bet your debate would really wake people up to a lot of key issues, and you would treat the candidates fairly, giving them their chance to get their fair amount of time in.

You could raise the bar on what a good debate should look like, addressing real issues, not propaganda issues, not superficial. You could show America what a debate about freedom and the threats to it entails.

I would also argue that when you host debates, it would be best to keep the number of contestants at five or under, and Infowars should be the one to decide which of the candidates are the most liberty-conscious. You would base it on that, not just on their popularity in the mainstream.

I would argue that with Infowars running debates like this, that it is conceivable that an outstanding candidate from everyday America could rise from obscurity to win the election, including those who are not a member of any party.

I would even argue that Infowars could even do a good job of hosting a national election debate in other English-speaking Nations, such as the U.K. or Ireland, where they are familiar with the politics, and where the politics are supposed to be in support of freedom.

Postscript: In the debate, you should also take time to do a plug for the great InfowarsLife product line you have that supports your broadcast.


( redirects to the above story)

Create your own user feedback survey



Aug. 10; 2:05 am MDT

  • Infowars Presidential Debate suggestion in Alphabetics - I took the ASCII sum of the url of my PESN story and looked it up in the Old and New Testament lexicons. It is totally relevant to the idea of a Presidential Debate, and it gives some very interesting commentary in support of my suggestion that Infowars start hosting these. (GreaterThings; August 10, 2015)

# # #

What You Can Do

  1. Contact Infowars
  2. Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
  3. Donate to PES Network to help us keep this news and directory and networking service going.
  4. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy sector.

See also

Resources at

Page composed by Sterling D. Allan
Last updated August 18, 2015




"It is harder to crack a prejudice than an atom." // "I'd rather be an optimist and a fool than a pessimist and right." -- Albert Einstein

ADVISORY: With any technology, you take a high risk to invest significant time or money unless (1) independent testing has thoroughly corroborated the technology, (2) the group involved has intellectual rights to the technology, and (3) the group has the ability to make a success of the endeavor.
All truth passes through three stages:
   First, it is ridiculed;
   Second, it is violently opposed; and
   Third, it is accepted as self-evident.

-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    "When you're one step ahead
of the crowd you're a genius.
When you're two steps ahead,
you're a crackpot."

-- Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, (Feb. 1998)

Submit • Privacy • About • Contact

PESWiki Departments:
Latest • News •XMLFeed • Directory • Congress • Top 5 • Open Sourcing
Copyright © 2002-2015, PES Network Inc.