You're viewing the old website

Free Energy is all about freedom:
Power to the people -- literally and figuratively

 "Free Energy" 

News XML
- PESN Specials
- About
- Pure Energy Blog
- Daily FE News
- Features
- Free Energy Now
- This Week in FE
- Newsletter
- How you can help
- Submit  
- Subscribe


Energy Topics

• Alt Fuels
• Anti-Gravity
• Batteries
• Betavoltaic
• Biofuels
 - BioDiesel
 - BioElectricity
 - Biomass
• Body Electric
• Brown's Gas
• Cold Fusion
• Conservation
• Electrolysis
• Electromagnetic OU
• Fuel Cells
• Fuel Efficiency
 - Electric Vehicles
 - Engines
 - Hydroxy
• Fusion
• Geothermal
• Gravity Motors
• Human Powered
• Hydro
• Hydrogen
• Joe Cells
• Lighting
• Magnet Motors
• Nanotechnology
• Nuclear
• Nucl. Remediation
• Oil
• Piezoelectric
• Plasma
• River
• Salt Water Mix
• Solar
• Solid State Gen.
• Tesla Turbines
• Thermal Electric
• Tidal
• Vortex
• Waste to Energy
• Water
 - Water as Fuel
• Wave
• Wind
• Wireless Electricity
• Zero Point Energy
• MORE . . .

Open Source
• Freddy's Cell
• Bedini SG
• Safe Haven Villages
• MORE . . .

• Awards
• Conservation
• Conspiracy
• Directories
• Investment
• Kudos
• Legal
• Organizations
• Plastic and Energy
• Recycling
• Suppression
• Tools
• Trends
• MORE . . .

• OverUnity Forum
• Employment
• Events
• Humor
• Magazines
• Movies
• Newsletters
• Discuss. Groups

• Store
• Buyer Beware
- - - - - - - - - -
- Donate
- Contact




You are here: > News > February 22, 2013

Keppe Motor Maybe Not 'Verified' Overunity Yet

While it turns out that the "137% efficient" result I have been citing, from a third party lab in Europe, was afterward re-examined and modified to under 100% efficiency, there are still reasons to hold out hope that the Keppe motor may yet prove out, not just as "overunity", but able to self-sustain, the ultimate proof.

Alex Frescari demonstrates one of the Keppe motors.

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

Following my trip to Brazil to see the Keppe motor and the amazing group behind it, as part of the STOP the Destruction of the World association, I have been saying that the R&D version of the Keppe motor was shown to be in the region of 137% efficient by two independent, highly credible laboratories in Europe.

A few days ago, in communicating with an academician involved in that testing, who is friendly to the notion of overunity, I learned that the 137% efficient conclusion was arrived at without sufficient time to properly evaluate the testing parameters, and that afterward, the conclusion was modified and the result was under 100% efficient.

The Keppe Motor scientists are exuberant and have reason to believe the motor could be overunity, pulling energy from the environment/space. The numbers they saw in Europe corroborated what they had measured using their own testing equipment in Brazil.

You can see in one of the videos about their technology an example of them powering a ceiling fan with just a small 9-volt battery, using a small fraction of the amount of energy that a normal ceiling fan consumes to give the same output. They show several other interesting effects and measurements in that video.

While they have respect for the academician who retracted the 137% efficiency figure, their exuberance for the possibility of overunity caused them to downplay this, wondering if perhaps academic pressure was to blame. I certainly have heard of academicians who measure overunity not being willing to stand behind those results, but this was most likely not the case in this instance, with this academician.

While on this topic, I would like to point something out that should be brought into consideration in measurements of this sort. We must remember that taking friction (bearings, air, electrical) into account; that efficiency readings above 95% are likely to be getting "help" from somewhere else, and demonstrate harnessing a "free energy" source, even though such a device is not yet to the point of being able to self-loop or provide excess energy. However, measurements in this vicinity are certainly indications of the possibility of something very unusual happening.
Overunity is defined as putting out more energy than is consumed, so really, even something above a certain threshold of friction expectation, should technically be classified as overunity, even though the "measured efficiency" level might be less than 100%. The academician who was involved in measuring the Keppe Motor said that the results were in this region.

Hence, even though the scientists did not conclude that the Keppe Motor is above 100% efficient, there are ample reasons to be interested in the design.

Furthermore, I am hopeful that they will be able to get a self-looped system running, along the lines of the Self-Looped Motor-Generator systems some 18 other independent groups have claimed to achieve. In these scenarios, it is the combination of two motor/generator systems that appears to get some kind of harmonic going whereby environmental energy is harnessed. The mechanics of some of the Keppe R&D motors lend themselves to being easily adjusted to find such points of resonance, if they are to be found.

I have not yet communicated with the other European lab that tested the Keppe motor and allegedly measured overunity, but since the above-mentioned lab test came after that one, I presume that a similar scenario may hold true there as well.

Here is an email I received on February 21 from Alex Frascari, who is a lead scientist in the Keppe Motor group.

The 6 pole and the ceiling fan are not overunity. The 6 pole has a 90% efficiency (confirmed by third parties) and we have improved it up to now to 97% (which would be enough to start challenging some of the pre-conceived ideas of conventional science, but we have not yet confirmed it by third parties). It is driven by an electronic circuit with transistors.

The 6 pole motor is 375W (1/2 HP) with constant efficiency over 90%. (This is not much for big motors above 5 or 10HP, but it is a lot in this range of power.)

Our overunity prototype is a 4W motor driven by relay circuit with the turbo system. None of the other prototypes have the turbo because we are still working on reproducing the phenomenon with transistors. (With relays, the turbo improves efficiency by 35%, while with transistors, up to now, we only gain 10%, which is not enough for overunity). The last reports I have on the measurement of this small overunity motor concern third parties with whom we have non-disclosure agreements. 

Because the power is small, it is difficult to measure very small currents, and it involves calculations to correct offsets of the probes. Another problem is that it is not totally stable; and period and amplitude vary along time. Therefore, the people involved require that we do more tests before going public with the results. We agree with this, but the costs are prohibitive, unless we get some external funding. 

Nevertheless, we get overunity results of at least 10% in all tests we have made. (In the overall efficiency = (Pmech + Pnoload + Thermalloss coil1 + Thermalloss coil2/Pel input) measured at the terminals of the coils). [Pmech = mechanical power; Pnoload = power with no load; Thermalloss of the coils is the heat that emanates from the coils, above room temperature; Pel input = electrical input power.]

In relation to the reports, we have not worked with this machine for the last 2 years, so I have to find and look through all the files and send you the most accurate possible. I have some Excel files, but they are huge (several pages of 125.000 lines each) and I am afraid they will be modified and distributed over the internet with false data. (This can happen even unintentionally, if you open the file on a version of Excel that only supports 60.000 lines, it will cut away half of the data and all calculations will be wrong). Because they are so big, it is difficult to transform them in pdf. I found the measurement protocols but they are in Portuguese and I have to translate them (I have only an incomplete version in English).

So what I propose is the following:

1. We are going to set up the 4W motor, make new measurements and film the experiment. This way we can make a simplified report in pdf that can be downloadable. This will take a couple of weeks.

2. I will translate the measurement protocol and send it to you.

You know, Sterling, science is very strict. That is why I am afraid when people on the Internet start giving opinions about things, when there is no possibility to discuss the matter in a scientific environment. If we already had a self running it would be easy, because then you do not have to explain anything. But since we do not have it (yet) we have to proceed with prudence and caution.

Full Disclosure

PES has a business relationship with the Keppe Motor group, and stands to benefit from their success.

# # #

Audio/Visual Links

Relevant Web Links

What You Can Do

  1. See Suggestions for How to Get Involved with the Roll-out of Exotic Free Energy 
  2. Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
  3. Click to Tweet: 
  4. Donate to PES Network to help us keep this news and directory and networking service going.
  5. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy sector.
  6. Let professionals in the renewable energy sector know about the promise of this technology. 

Keppe-Related Coverage by PESN

See also

Resources at

Page composed by Sterling D. Allan
Last updated April 12, 2013




"It is harder to crack a prejudice than an atom." // "I'd rather be an optimist and a fool than a pessimist and right." -- Albert Einstein

ADVISORY: With any technology, you take a high risk to invest significant time or money unless (1) independent testing has thoroughly corroborated the technology, (2) the group involved has intellectual rights to the technology, and (3) the group has the ability to make a success of the endeavor.
All truth passes through three stages:
   First, it is ridiculed;
   Second, it is violently opposed; and
   Third, it is accepted as self-evident.

-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    "When you're one step ahead
of the crowd you're a genius.
When you're two steps ahead,
you're a crackpot."

-- Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, (Feb. 1998)

Submit • Privacy • About • Contact

PESWiki Departments:
Latest • News •XMLFeed • Directory • Congress • Top 5 • Open Sourcing
Copyright © 2002-2015, PES Network Inc.