You're viewing the old pesn.com website
 


Features:
•
Keshe: Drone Interception Video Demonstrates Magravs System Capability
• Bedini SG "Authorized" Beginner's Handbook Posted -- Not First
• Water as Fuel -- November 2012 Update
• Mercedes' Ener-G-Force to Run on Water via Hydro-Tech Converter
• Will Exotic Free Energy Not Arrive Until a Sufficient Awakening Happens?
• Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory Show Addresses Time Travel



 "Free Energy" 

News XML
- PESN Specials
- About
- Daily FE News
- Features
- Free Energy Now
- This Week in FE
- Newsletter
- How you can help
- Submit

 

Directory
Energy Topics

• Alt Fuels
• Anti-Gravity
• Batteries
• Betavoltaic
• Biofuels
 - BioDiesel
 - BioElectricity
 - Biomass
• Body Electric
• Brown's Gas
• Cold Fusion
• Conservation
• Electrolysis
• Electromagnetic OU
• Fuel Cells
• Fuel Efficiency
 - Electric Vehicles
 - Engines
 - Hydroxy
• Fusion
• Geothermal
• Gravity Motors
• Human Powered
• Hydro
• Hydrogen
• Joe Cells
• Lighting
• Magnet Motors
• Nanotechnology
• Nuclear
• Nucl. Remediation
• Oil
• Piezoelectric
• Plasma
• River
• Salt Water Mix
• Solar
• Solid State Gen.
• Tesla Turbines
• Thermal Electric
• Tidal
• Vortex
• Waste to Energy
• Water
 - Water as Fuel
• Wave
• Wind
• Wireless Electricity
• Zero Point Energy
• MORE . . .

Open Source
• Freddy's Cell
• Bedini SG
• Safe Haven Villages
• MORE . . .

Resources
• Awards
• Conservation
• Conspiracy
• Directories
• Investment
• Kudos
• Legal
• Organizations
• Plastic and Energy
• Recycling
• Suppression
• Tools
• Trends
• MORE . . .

Mingling
• OverUnity Forum
• Employment
• Events
• Humor
• Magazines
• Movies
• Newsletters
• Discuss. Groups

Shopping
• Store
• Buyer Beware
- - - - - - - - - -
- Donate
- Contact

 

 

 


/2010/10/13/9501711_Kanarev_critiques_Nobel_physics_prize/
You are here:
PureEnergySystems.com > News > Oct. 13, 2010

Kanarev critiques Nobel Prize in Physics

Russian Professor Ph. M. Kanarev presents facts about the thickness of graphene and the theoretical bensole molecule, concluding that the statement concerning the one-atom-thick carbon film is erroneous. A video he sent in an earlier email announced "The world's first self-rotating electric generator."

 


Preface by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News


On Oct. 12, I received an email from Professor Kanarev with an attached document he composed that he thought might be of interest to our readership.  It turns out to be an analysis of the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics that was awarded jointly to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov "for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material graphene".  Apparently, Kanarev has been working in this field as well, and may even be further along in his work than these two who received the Nobel Prize.

Also today, I stumbled onto an email that Kanarev sent me back on Sept. 12 with a video attached. He wrote: "It seems to me this VIDEO will be interesting to you and to the readers of your site."  I've posted the video and sent an email to Kanarev asking for more information about it.  The video starts out: "You are seeing the world's first self-rotating electric generator." Stay tuned for our report once we get more info on that. 

Update as of Oct. 13, 1:00 pm Mountain:
I received an email from Kanarev giving further information about this generator.  It is his.  You can read about it here. He said it has been tested by a scientist from the Russian Academy of Science.

The tubing resembles Kanrev's electrolysis systems.

Kanarev's 3 kW hydrogen producing experimental plasma electrolysis reactor in operation during a demonstration in January 2002 in Krasnodar, Russia (Photo: J. Hartikka).

My brother, Nathan, was the one who first talked up Kanarev to me a few years ago.  I built a feature page about his electrolysis in May of 2006, and the New Energy Congress acknowledged it as a significant contribution and even listed in the Top 100 Clean Energy Technologies for a while.  Greg Watson wrote:

"Professor Kanarev has shown a new form of electrochemistry which can generate much more Hydrogen than conventional electrolysis ever could. He claims at least 10 times but his data suggests more like 4,000 times more Hydrogen than the Wh input would predict."

I give you this context so that you can more fully appreciate the person writing this critique of the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics.  You can download a PDF version of this article here.


NOBEL RESULT IN PHYSICS HAS BEEN OBTAINED BY THE TRIAL AND ERROR METHOD

Ph.M. Kanarev, Doctor of Engineering, Prof.

kanphil@mail.ru 

Announcement. We congratulate the Russian-born scientists, the new Nobel Prize winners in physics, for the important scientific result, which they have obtained by the trial and error method.

As it has been announced by TV, the essence of the result is a formation of one-atom-thick carbon films by the method of Scotch tape attachment to graphite and further separation of the graphite films, which have stuck to Scotch tape, with the help of water. High strength and electrical conductivity are the main properties of the carbon films.  The new theory of microworld makes it possible to describe this process theoretically.

Two natural formations, which consist of one and the same chemical element –carbon and have radically different properties, are known. One writes on paper with the help of graphite and cuts glass with the help of diamond. Why? The new theory of microworld gives a simple answer to this question. Carbon is the sixth element in Mendeleyev’s table. Its nucleus has 6 protons, and the number of the neutrons can be various. 98.90% of the nuclei of the carbon atoms have 6 neutrons, and 1.10% has 7 neutrons. The graphite atoms have flat nuclei (Fig. 1), and the diamond nuclei have spatial nuclei (Fig. 2).

It appears from the new theory of microworld that the protons of the atomic nuclei are arranged on the surface of the nuclei, and the atomic electrons interact with the protons of the nuclei linearly, not orbitally (Figs 3 and 4). As a result, the graphite atom is a flat formation (Fig. 3), and the diamond atom is the limitedly symmetrical spatial formation (Fig. 4).

A flat atom of carbon is responsible for graphite stratified layers. The flat atoms of carbon join together and form flat clusters; an assembly of clusters forms a film. The European experimenters have managed to take photos of C6H6 cluster, which consists of the flat atoms of carbon and the atoms of hydrogen (Fig. 5). There are photos of carbon films- graphenes (Fig. 5).

 

Now let us correct the Nobel Prize winners and their experts. Let us pay attention to nebulosity of ray-path projections on the external contour of the photo of the bensole cluster (Fig. 5). These ray-path projections are the hydrogen atoms. Their dimensions are close to a nanodimension ( ), and the most modern microscope fails to see them. The hydrogen atom consists of the proton and the electron. The theoretical radius of the electron    differs from the experimental one   in the sixth sign after the comma. This dimension is 3 orders of magnitude less than the nanodimension ( ).  Then, the dimension of   is given in the photo of graphene (Fig. 5). This dimension belongs to the theoretical benzole molecule (Fig. 5), which consists of six flat atoms of carbon. The dimension of each atom is approximately . The dimension of each benzole molecule, which consists of six atoms of carbon, is approximately . Then, the actual size of a dis-tance between two atoms of carbon, which is shown in the photo of graphene  , is ap-proximately . It means that the resolution of the microscope, which took photos of graphene
phene, is by two or three order so magnitude less than the nanodimension. If the new Nobel Prize winners obtained a carbon one-atom-thick film, there would be no space for a motion of the free electrons, which provide its high electrical conductivity. It appears from this that the Nobel Prize winners separated the carbon films, which were much thicker than one atom, from graphite with the help of Scotch tape. It is natural, because the free electrons, which move between the atomic layers, provide high electrical conductivity of these films. It means that the statement concerning the one-atom-thick carbon film is erroneous.

Limited symmetry of carbon atoms provides strength of electron bonds between them and, consequently, of the whole graphene film, which fancied structure is given in Fig. 5, and the theoretical structure is given in Fig. 6. Its strength is stipulated by symmetry of bonds between the electrons of the carbon atoms, which are hexahedral contour closed.


CONCLUSION  

The above-mentioned facts show the significance of the experimental achievements of the new Nobel Prize winners, which have been obtained by them by the trial and error method, as well as their insufficient understanding of physical essence of their achievements. But they are young, and they have a chance to strengthen their theoretical knowledge by means of mastering the new theory of microworld. We shall make a detail analysis of the achievements of the new Nobel Prize winners at the first Russian seminar of the independent Academy of Nanoprocesses and Nanotechnologies (NANO Academy) devoted to the foundations of nanoprocesses and nanotechnologies.  This seminar will held in the city of Krasnodar, Russia, on November 25-27, 2010 (see the site “Akamedic” (www.akademik.su), its topic being “The new laws of microworld are the ways to mastering the new nanotechnologies”.  

The above-mentions facts show erroneousness of the orbital motion of the electron in the atom, and the Nobel Committee has an opportunity to apologize before many generations of schoolchildren, students, postgraduates, engineers and scientists for a damage caused by awarding of a series of Nobel prizes in physics and chemistry by mistake.  The erroneous authority of those prizes crippled their scientific intellect.  

REFERENCES

1. Ph.M. Kanarev. The Foundations of Physchemistry of Microworld. Monograph. The 14 edition. https://kubsau.ru/science/prof.php?kanarev 
2. Ph.M. Kanarev. Answers to the questions concerning microworld. Study guide. https://kubsau.ru/science/prof.php?kanarev 


What is ironic here, is that from what I can tell, Kanarev has indeed provided evidence here that the Nobel Prize in Physics was indeed mis-awarded, and that his work actually supersedes that of Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov in this area -- but that his work in Electromagnetic overunity overshadows all of this, making it seem trivial in comparison.

Here are some of the initial comments posted on the video he sent me, and which I posted just a few hours prior to posting the above story:

shubus 
Tantalizing! As usual, we're left with wondering why the obvious follow through was not done..... 

TheIronStark 
this seems to be a kind of quantum field generator yes something in the toroidal....

ashtweth 
Thanks Sterling some ting special about those torridals

# # #

Related Story

Comments

Kanerev is a loose cannon  . . . .

My ex-father-in-law is a retired physics professor at Kuban State University in Krasnodar, Russia.

My ex brother-in-law is a 26 year old PhD in Physics.

The ex father-in-law just arrived in the USA yesterday and says the whole university staff knows of this fellow Kanerev and he is but another "loose cannon on the deck" in science.

Just look at the way he criticizes the 2 ex-Russian Nobel prize winners. It's mere academic jealousy. Like so many others he is using your website as a forum to announce to the world he has a self running motor - - - but if you fly over to Krasnodar there he will have a whole laundry list of excuses just like Mike Brady had.
 
I have been all over Krasnodar and through the university labs many times. It's a wonderful place.

* * * *

See also

Resources at PESWiki.com

Page posted by Sterling D. Allan Oct. 12, 2010
Last updated October 27, 2010
 
 

Bestsellers


Scan Gauge II

Plugs in dashboard for instant mpg and other performance data.