You are here: PureEnergySystems.com
> News > September
Part II: Magnetometer on 9/11 Shows Exotic Weapons Evidence
On the days prior to September 11, 2001, the earth's magnetic field was
quite stable, as Hurricane Erin tracked directly up the -15 line of that field toward New
York City as a category 3 storm. Then on 9/11, the magnetic field readings went
all over the place in 100% correspondence to WTC 1, 2, and later WTC 7 going
largely to dust.
|On September 16, Dr. Wood sent a "cease and desist"
notification in response to my request to use her images and text
quotations from her website. Complying with her request, I've removed the
exact images and longer
quotations. You'll have to refer to her book for those. She wishes for
people to get the whole book with all its information and evidence, rather
than get portions of the evidence. I defer to "Fair
Use" provisions of Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.
Pure Energy Systems News
Dust to Dust
Last December, I published a fairly lengthy Part
I of a report I wrote regarding
Dr. Judy Wood's book, Where
did the Towers Go: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11
|REMOVED: Figure 191. (9/23/01) A closer
look. (NOAA) [broken
Sky view of WTC wreckage on September 27. Source:
Wood's book has this as an insert, with the buildings located and labeled,
with numbers of floors indicated. It's also on p. 147, fig. 144.
Some of the highlights from that report include showing photographs of an
ambulance parked about 30 feet in front of World Trade Center (WTC) building 1
essentially undamaged with a clear spot of sidewalk next to it, standing higher
than the rubble around it, even as most of the WTC buildings around it were
It wasn't just buildings 1, 2, and 7 that turned to dust that day. The height of
those buildings does not correspond to the lack of height of the rubble pile
- 22-story, WTC 3: completely gone except for one little corner.
- 9-story WTC 4, 3/4 gone, to the ground, with one wing remaining.
- 8-story WTC 6, half gone, to the ground, cored out in the middle,
but not its edges.
- 9-story WTC 5 was essentially the only one remaining mostly intact, except
for what appears to be limited crushing damage from sizeable fragments.
There was something going on that day that goes far beyond just nanothermite
demolition charges being prepositioned inside buildings 1, 2, and 7 to bring
them down in near free-fall speed (building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane,
actually fell at free-fall speed for much of its descent).
We showed images to illustrate that as the buildings fell you could see
individual pieces going to dust, even as they descended, so that by the time
they hit the ground, most of the material had turned to dust, which wafted away
in a huge cloud.
The pile from building 1 alone should have been taller than the 9-story building
5, which was the only building left largely in tact, yet there sits this
ambulance in front of the building, not even impacted.
If it had been the collapse of buildings 1 and 2 that caused the damage to
buildings 3, 4 and 6, then that collapsing debris would have cremated the
ambulance and buried it beneath a pile of rubble.
We also pointed out that the basement of the WTC complex was nearly completely
un-damaged. The buildings from above did not smash through the ground level and
penetrate into the sub-floors. We also pointed out that the seismic signature
from the building "collapse" was consistent with the removal of the
weight of the buildings, but not of their collapse.
As Dr. Wood notes as the primary premise of her excellent book, those buildings
turned to dust. They did not "collapse."
Something else was under way that day -- and it doesn't have anything to do with
jets flying into buildings by amateur pilots. It is some kind of advanced
weaponry that was being displayed; and she thinks it was a demonstration of John
Hutchison type effects on a massive scale. Hence the subtitle of her book: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11.
Sterling's compilation. Found in Wood, pp. 380-381 and pp.
470-471; which she gathered from elsewhere.
At the end of chapter 20, Dr. Wood concludes:
In Chapter 17, we saw that all of the phenomena seen at the WTC on 9/11
could be produced by the Hutchison Effect. Although they are not on the
same scale, they appear to be the same phenomena or to involve the same
type of physics. The Hutchison Effect is produced by interfering
radio-frequency energy within a static field--for example, by interfering
microwave energy within a static field. The static field used by John
Hutchison is produced by a Tesla coil or by a Van de Graaf
What I would like to touch on in this belated Part II of this series are a
couple of phenomenon that happened that day -- magnetic field manipulation and
hurricane steering -- that most likely played into the setting that made this
weaponry effect possible of turning most of the WTC buildings to dust. The level
of sophistication represented here, and the ability to manipulate what most of
us think of as phenomenon of nature -- acts of God alone -- is so high that most
people would immediately brush it off as nonsense to even think for a second
that the nefarious people who brought that destruction used these tools as part
of their arsenal.
Since the primary cause of disbelief when it comes to the events of 9/11
has nothing to do with fact and everything to do with cognitive dissonance --
not wanting to believe because of the horrific ramifications of accepting the
information as true -- I implore of you to put aside your world view, and to
just look at the data as a scientist would, dispassionately, weighing the facts.
Remember, we are talking about a government who in their black budget does
things like chemtrails and builds things like HAARP.
Earth's Magnetic Field Fluctuations on 9/11
In Chapter 19 of her book, Dr. Wood talks about the Earths Magnetic Field on
9/11. She shows data taken from stations around the world, and shows their
fluctuations. Bear in mind that these readings would show differently for
Take a look at figure 424, which shows
"fluctuations of the earth's magnetic field in the direction of magnetic
north, from 8 pm September 8 through 8 pm [EST] September 12 -- four days. You
will see that the fluctuations were somewhat minor until the events of 9/11,
correspond to huge fluctuations that immediately relate to catastrophic events
that day, starting with the collapse of WTC2, then WTC1, and then leveling out
after the collapse of WTC7 later that day.
"WTC 1 hole" refers to when WTC1 was hit. "WTC 1 poof"
refers to when WTC 1 turned to dust, etc.
[Per her request, I've removed the figures from Dr. Wood's book, but here is a
of a presentation she gave where she describes these magnetometer readings. You
can also see these graphs on Dr. Wood's website (about 3/5 down this
Figure 435 shows a one-day span. Note that the movement of the magnetic field
strength has a 100% correlation to the major events of 9/11, especially the
collapse of buildings 2, 1, then 7.
Figure 425 shows an even closer view of that same data.
Figure 429 shows that same time span, pulling data from stations around the
I don't think anyone could argue that there is a striking correlation.
Whatever is going on, this is worth consideration and study into the question of
what happened and how it happened and what effect it had.
At the end of chapter 20, Dr. Wood concludes: "
In Chapter 19, it was shown that magnetometer readings in Alaska exhibited
excursions of the earth's magnetic field that were coincident with the
time of each event at the WTC on 9/11."
Even less well-known than the fact that building 7 collapsed in free-fall speed
later in the day on 9/11, is the fact that there was a major hurricane just off
the coast of New York. This was a category 3 storm, nearly the size of Katrina,
definitely worth mention; yet the unusual thing is that many news stations
didn't even mention it earlier that day, before the tragic events of 9/11.
On page 400 of her book, Dr. Wood shows a sampling of news stories from 9/11 on the
left, compared to the actual size of the hurricane that should have been shown,
on the right. The
superimposed labeling has been added by myself.
Figure 442 shows a photograph from a jet showing the dust arising from
Manhattan with Hurricane Erin seen in the background. It was just off shore.
Image source: http://hereisnewyork.org//jpegs/photos/5748.jpg
As a sort of omen, nudging me to go ahead and write up this report for this
9/11/13 anniversary, the other night, Sept. 6, 2013, before retiring to bed, I
checked Weather.com to see whether I should close the windows or if I could
leave them open to help cool the house. Here
is one of the headline stories that was linked up. It was titled
"Record-breaking hurricane season," and the reason for being
"record-breaking" was because it is so late in the season before a
large storm is seen, similar to what was the case when Hurricane Erin arrived on
9/11/01. It showed Hurricane Erin from September 11, 2001. But for some reason,
the link is not pulling up right now.
Figure 446 shows satellite imagery from September 10, then September 11, 2001,
showing the coinciding of a high pressure system and the hurricane right over
New York City during the events of that day.
Now, tying this hurricane into the earth's magnetic field readings, figure
444 shows the path of Hurricane Erin following the line formed by what is a
Adapted from figure 444, Magnetic declination and
the path of Hurricane Erin, which was adapted from Wikimedia
Figure 434 shows the daily path of Hurricane Erin as it honed in and then
tracked along the -15 geomagnetic reference field then departed from that on
[Here's a similar depiction, but without the overlaid -15 magnetic field shown
along the path of the hurricane as it approached New York. You can see how it
honed in on that line, then followed it almost exactly.]
[REMOVED: Figure 434. Latitude and Longitude as
rectangular coordinates. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html
The NOAA site does not show the superimposition of the -15 magnetic field line
that the hurricane tracks toward NYC.]
Figure 443 shows the size of the hurricane as it approached New York, showing
that it was its largest at 8:46 am on 9/11/01, when it turned. [The following
image, from NOAA
doesn't show the hurricane size as Dr. Wood's image does, along with date/time
Wood's Figure 443 is labeled: "Best track
of Hurricane Erin, September 1-17, 2001.
You saw from figure 424 above that the magnetic
field polarity and magnitude were nominally stable in the days prior to 9/11/01,
but that on 9/11/01 they began to fluctuate wildly. Bear that in mind when you
look at figure 444, showing the -15 point in the field that the hurricane
appears to hone in on and then track in a straight line. It was nominally a
straight, consistent line in the days prior to 9/11.
At the end of chapter 20, Dr. Wood concludes: "
In Chapter 18, it was shown that Hurricane Erin was centered just outside
of New York City on the morning of 9/11/01 with her outer bands reaching
over Cape Cod as well as reaching the end of Long Island. On 9/11,
thunder, which is evidence of an electric field, was reported at JFK,
LaGuardia, and Newark Airports, the three major airports around New York
More info about this can be found on Dr. Wood's site at http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/
What does Dr. Wood say about these correlations? On page 452, at the conclusion of
chapter 20, she says (paragraph breaks added):
|Once the mechanism of something is understood, it is no longer seen as
magic. Each of the phenomena that resulted from whatever took place on
9/11 can be understood as something many people have seen before, although
in a different and usually far, far less massive context. But one thing is
perfectly clear: 9/11 was the demonstration of a technology of horrendous
magnitude. Such a technology, however monstrously destructive we've seen
it to be, can also be used for constructive and benevolent purposes, such
as, for just one obvious example, providing clean energy. And, like
"magic," understanding it will only empower us.
[...Other excerpts quoted in above sections...]
And we know that rotating electrical fields can produce a magnetic field.
And an interference of these fields can cause molecular dissociation. And
referring to the article quoted on page 450, if it is possible to stop a
vortex, then it is certainly possible to start one. And levitation as well
as fusion of dissimilar materials and a destruction of materials can
result from an energy vortex.
What reason is there that a technology based on the same type of physics
as the Hutchison Effect, and one that produces the same phenomena as the
Hutchison effect, cannot be super-sized?
As much as I know about black-budget and black op projects that the
conspirators have had up their sleeves all these years, it is hard for me to
fathom how they controlled a hurricane and a high pressure system to this
extent, to show up on the "9/11" date on schedule. From what I
understand, "9/11" has occult significance to this cabal. Furthermore,
with the departure of planes from various airports, things had to be timed
nearly to the minute.
However, as you look at the magnetic field readings surrounding the events on
9/11, there is no doubt a correlation. Furthermore, Hurricane Erin did indeed
follow a stable magnetic field line for several days; and it did pause and then
move off on 9/11. And it was its largest right around the time of WTC 1 and 2
destruction to dust; and the high pressure system was also moving in the same
area. There were two rotating weather patterns that coincided directly over
Manhattan that day at that time. And the damage done to the steel members that
remained, in quite a few cases, did resemble the Hutchison Effect.
Crazy stuff. Indeed, truth is stranger than fiction.
It's no wonder we have ET visitors zipping around observing this show, no doubt
making sure things don't get too far out of hand.
Whoever pulled off 9/11 had one primary objective: FEAR. That is classically how
Therefore, the primary antidote to their tactics is to get out of fear. And what
is the most effective way to do that? "Perfect love casts out all
Isn't that the world we want? One based on love, trust, respect, willful
sharing. Not the world of hate, fear, control, and tyranny that the New World
Order cabal has been hoisting on us for decades -- made possible by the
decadence of our civilization.
Wickedness brings captivity, both individually and collectively. If we don't
want tyranny, then we should stop deserving it.
Let's wake up, turn to God and goodness, and step into our godly nature, and
make the powers that be irrelevant. Let's get conscious so that we deserve the
free energy technologies that will empower us, literally and figuratively.
While I've got your attention, I'm just curious where you, as my audience,
stand on this whole 9/11 thing.
# # #
|FAIR USE NOTICE: The above images may contain copyrighted (©) material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit
[the revenue from advertising will just offset the expense of memory and
bandwidth for a page this size with this much material] to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
You can post your comment down below.
I sent a link to this page to John Hutchison to get his input. On September 11, 2013 7:12 PM
[Mountain] he said:
Dr. Judy Wood studied these effects fully. Magnetometer readings indicate a project in the works
-- or the shock of folks worldwide would affect the magnetometers. This is known
science. See the Noetic Science group.
See Art Bell's mass tests with his Coast audiences. Mind effects are very real.
Anyway, this is my comment. But dew weapons cause magnetometer reading as well.
See Boeing's new weapon EMP unit test.
John K. Hutchison
This next one came in by email, that says that Hurricane Erin was a
highly-studied hurricane. I would venture to say that this was part of the manipulation
-- agencies involved in tracking as part of the steering.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:27 AM [Mountain]
Subject: Hurricane Erin
2001, Hurricane Erin was THE most studied hurricane to date.
BTW, each cookie cutout plane shaped hole appeared at the
same time there was a magnetic fluctuation, too.
What You Can Do
- See Suggestions for How to Get Involved with the Roll-out of Exotic Free Energy
- Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
- Click to Tweet: http://clicktotweet.com/SN20k
- Donate to PES Network
to help us keep this news and directory and networking service going.
- Subscribe to our newsletter
to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy