Part I: The Ambulance that Survived WTC1 on 9/11 = Best Evidence for Dustification and Free Energy Demo

How conceivable do you think it is that an ambulance sitting 30 feet away from 110-story, 500,000-ton, WTC 1 would be un-smashed, resting on an un-damaged parking structure, and be taller than the rubble pile around it? Something (probably involving black-op FE) turned those buildings to dust.

An ambulance sits essentially undamaged on the ground maybe 100 feet in front of World Trade Center Building 1 after it and Building 2 have "collapsed". Image source: BreakForNews.com. (back-up here).

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

In her book, Where did the Towers Go: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 (see http://WhereDidTheTowersGo.com); Dr. Judy Wood has compiled an amazing collection of photos, videos, statements, and data that convey a very convincing theory that the World Trade Center towers were not brought down just by jets flying into them and the resulting fires, as portrayed as the official story. Nor were they brought down just by pre-positioned, controlled demolition charges, as portrayed by many in the 9/11 Truth movement.

Rather, she concludes that they were not "brought down", but rather were turned to dust before hitting the ground, via some kind of black budget, directed energy weapon technology not acknowledged to exist by any military on earth. The effect exhibits characteristics of Tesla and Hutchison technologies. This was address recently in Jesse Ventura's "Death Ray" episode of his Conspiracy Theory series.

In my opinion, one of the most compelling photos in support of this model is the ambulance parked on ground level in front of World Trade Center (WTC) Building 1. Other than some dust on top of it, and a door slightly askew, it appears to be undamaged -- while you would expect it to be as flat as a pancake, far out of view, buried deep under a pile of rubble.

No, it wasn't driven there after the building came down. There isn't a path clear enough for that, though that would be even more amazing (that a drivable path would be open that close to the disintegrated building).

Still, at maybe 8 feet (2.4 meters) high, the in-tact ambulance is actually higher than a lot of the rubble found around it. You can even see the ground next to the ambulance.

With a push broom, and lifting a few small chunks of rubble by hand, in five minutes, you could clear a spot on the still-flat ground next to the ambulance large enough to lay down a blanket and have a picnic. (A dust mask would be highly recommended, though at least you probably wouldn't have to worry about ants.)

You would expect that if a 110 story building with 500,000 tons of material had just fallen next to it, either by catastrophic collapse or controlled demolition, that there would be approximately 12+ stories of rubble at the base.

Even if a one- or two-story building had come down next to an ambulance via a severe earthquake, for example, its rubble would be higher than the ambulance. Yet in this case not just one, but two 1200-foot-tall buildings have just "come down" in this vicinity.

When I say "vicinity", I would estimate that the ambulance is parked approximately 30 feet away from what used to be WTC1. One could argue that distance is hard to judge in this photo shot with a telephoto lens. However, an aerial view of this same location gives a clear perspective, and shows how close the ambulance was to the building that is no more.

In the video below, at time stamp 0:30, you see close-up, aerial video footage of the ambulance that gives a clear indication of the proximity of the ambulance to the tower. A line of firemen are walking nearby on what remains flat ground of ground level, littered with some rubble around the now-gone buildings.

Look carefully at that footage and note how flat the ground is. You can still make out the ground through the rubble. It's not an uneven, 12-plus-story heap of concrete, metal, glass, marble, tile, office equipment, bodies, carpet, ceiling tiles. Most all of that has been turned to dust and blown away or settled. Essentially the only in-tact item to make it through in significant quantity is paper.

One of the workers interviewed the next day said that the highest pile of debris was not more than three stories high. (Part II; 5:13) A fireman being interviewed next to WTC 1 or 2 the following day mentions: "110 stories at ground level," as he stands on what looks like a clear parking lot (Part II; 5:05) with a sparse amount of debris and an untouched ambulance parked maybe 30 feet from the building, as if in a normal situation. (That ambulance may have been brought in later?)

A lot of the early commentary on television the day following the buildings' demise (prior to being given their talking points by their higher ups, to cover up the crime) was about the stark lack of rubble. The title of Judy's book: "Where did the Towers Go?" was actually repeated in effect several times by news anchors, such as Peter Jennings and George Stephanopoulos (video), as they puzzled over the lack of the amount of solid debris you would expect.

ABC reporter Robert Krulwich said:

"Engineers at the firm that built the buildings, best guess to account for the missing 1200 feet of material from each tower, is that large portions simply vaporized into the dust that rained down on New Yorkers immediately after the collapse. It was that powerful. We are talking here about 43,600 windows, 600,000 sq. ft. of glass, 200,000 tons of structural steel, 5 million sq. ft. of gypsum, 6 acres of marble and 425,000 cubic yards of concrete turned in good part into a cloud, says Environmental Medical Doctor, Dr. Stephen Levin [from Mt. Sinai Hospital]." (Part I; 4:15)

The ABC report continues:

"But most interesting, in the mix, they are looking, they think, at specs of steel that used to be beams and elevators, marble, and the lobby floor, and facings, so what were once the strongest architectural elements in the two towers, were pulverized. Large portions turned into clouds, like this one.

"Still there is this mystery. If some of the hardest materials were vaporized, how to account for the presence everywhere of paper. Fully intact letters, business forms, stationary. Paper is so fragile, and combustible, and yet, somehow, maybe because we have so much of it, it was everywhere." (Part I; 5:40)

Pre-Conceived Notions vs Reality

For years, based on the limited information I had, when I visualized the "pile" that represented the rubble from what used to be Buildings 1, 2, and 7, I pictured a heap that smashed through the basement, and rose in disarray from the bedrock upward. I didn't know until reading Judy's book that other WTC buildings were also hugely affected.

22-story, WTC 3: completely gone except for one little corner.
9-story WTC 4, 3/4 gone, to the ground, with one wing remaining.
8-story WTC 6, half gone, to the ground, cored out in the middle, but not its edges.
9-story WTC 5 was essentially the only one remaining mostly intact, except for what appears to be limited crushing damage from sizeable fragments.

So it wasn't just WTC 1,2 and 7 that went down that day. But not only is there a lack of a 12-story heap from Buildings 1 and 2, towering over the remnants of the smaller Buildings 4, 5, and 6; but an aerial view shows the surface level to still be mostly ground level. Of course by the time this photo was taken 16 days later, a lot of wreckage had already been hauled away. But at least you see that the ground is not an irregular shaped heap, deformed from the "falling buildings", which is what you would expect if those buildings had actually collapsed and not gone mostly to dust.

Sky view of WTC wreckage on September 27. Click for enlargement.
Source: Wood insert, and p. 147, fig. 144.

Reality is very different from that. In the above samples, you see footage of a largely flat surface, punctuated with some rubble, not an uneven, chaotic heap.

Previously, I would have thought that anything that might appear to be at "ground level" would be a function of a heap of rubble that smashed through the basement levels below.

In reality, the basement went largely unscathed -- nearly as untouched as the ambulance in the first photo above.

Here is a news clipping that says: "Engineers find much of the seven-story basement is intact." (Part I: 9:24)

Yes, there were uneven areas where ground level was breached and gaped into the basement. However, the "Bathtub" on which the WTC complex was built, to keep the waters from the nearby Hudson River from inundating the complex, went essentially unscathed. Here you see a view of the bathtub walls after it had been cleaned out.

(Wood, p. 120, figure 117)

It had more damage from the earthmovers excavating out the rubble than it did from the 1.2 million tons of WTC Building 1 and 2 "falling" on it.

So, back to the ambulance. Not only was it sitting un-smashed in front of WTC2, but it was sitting on top of a basement structure that was still in place, un-collapsed.

How conceivable do you think it is that an ambulance sitting 30 feet away from 110-story, 500,000-ton, WTC 1 would be un-smashed, resting on an un-damaged parking structure (at least there), and be taller than the rubble pile around it?

The official story certainly doesn't explain that, but neither does the "controlled demolition" version. The only explanation that is consistent with that factual observation is that, for the most part, the buildings didn't hit the ground but were turned to dust. That is what the replete visual evidence shows.

As chunks of building material are catapulted away from the building, you can see them disintegrating, with dust billowing from them as they fall.

Look at this one, from page 138 of Judy's book. The red arrow points to a large chunk of material that disintegrates as it falls, from the left frame to the right.

Nanothermite

So, why was nanothermite found in the dust, if these building's weren't brought down by controlled demolition? (Steven E. Jones, peer-reviewed paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal on April 3rd, 2009, which describes that nanothermite, a high-tech, military grade explosive, was used during the destruction of the WTC Twin Towers and Building 7.)

I'll get to that in a follow-up report, in which I proposed that Building 7 came down through more conventional means, and that is why the nanothermite showed up. And, perhaps, some nanothermite along with conventional explosives were used to pre-cut Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 to make them easier for the directed energy weapons to finish them off into dust. Hence the appearance of squibs in advance of the "collapsing" portion.

The fall of Building 7 looked nothing like the vaporization of Buildings 1 and 2. And the pile Building 7 left was deeper, resembling more closely what you would expect from controlled demolition.

Compare depth of debris pile from Building 7 on far left, to WTC 1 on far right, with 8-story WTC 6 between them. But also note that sidewalk level is essentially maintained next to the U.S. Post Office at the top left of the photo. (Source: Wood, p. 20, fig. 19).

Seismic Data

Judy argues against this, saying that Building 7 was also brought down the same way as the other buildings, but I don't buy her argument, for reasons I'll elaborate in a follow-up report. The strongest support for her argument is that the seismic signature of Building 7 was a mere 0.6 on the Richter scale (Seismology Group, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University; Wood, p. 65) -- barely registering above background -- which is consistent with the removal of the weight of the building from the ground, but not of the building crashing to the ground.

Buildings 2 and 1 had seismic signatures of 2.3 and 2.1, lasting 8 and 10 seconds, respectively, roughly the time it would take a bowling ball to drop free-fall from the top of a 110-story building. Those numbers are also consistent the the removal of a 500,000-ton weight from the earth over that duration, not of that mass collapsing to the earth. (Wood, chapter 6.)

Postscript

I've been sitting on this story for about a month, wanting to write something up. It's a huge subject with a lot of supporting information, not all of it easy to understand.

Finally, I decided to just go ahead and publish what I have so far, and then do some follow-up pieces later.

Coming Soon

The above is labeled "Part I" because I plan to do several follow-up reports on this dustification theme, including the following topics:

At least two methods used: controlled demolition (Building 7) and directed energy weaponry (WTC 1,2,3,4,6). Hence the occurrence of nanothermite in the dust mixture.
Analogues between the Hutchison Effect and what was observed on 9/11.

Source: Wood, pp. 380-381 and pp. 470-471.

Earth's magnetic field fluctuations directly correspond to 9/11 events, supporting directed energy weapons model.

Category 3, Hurricane Erin, off shore during 9/11 events, a likely context to support the function of the directed energy weaponry. Hurricane is barely acknowledged, to the point of appearing like a cover-up.

Steven Jones is not a "disinformation agent". He sincerely believes that controlled demolition, using nanothermite along with conventional explosives, was used to bring down the towers, based on the evidence he has personally witnessed and studied. (See my November 19, 2012 report about his reasons for saying that what people are calling "cold fusion" isn't "fusion.")

FAIR USE NOTICE: The above images may contain copyrighted (© ) material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit [the revenue from advertising will just offset the expense of memory and bandwidth for a page this size with this much material] to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode

# # #

What You Can Do

See Suggestions for How to Get Involved with the Roll-out of Exotic Free Energy
Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
Click to Tweet: http://clicktotweet.com/If40e
Donate to PES Network to help us keep this news and directory and networking service going.
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy sector.

Part I: The Ambulance that Survived WTC1 on 9/11 = Best Evidence for Dustification and Free Energy Demo

Coming Soon

What You Can Do

See also