You are here: PureEnergySystems.com
> News > December
Part I: The Ambulance that Survived WTC1 on 9/11 = Best Evidence for Dustification
and Free Energy Demo
How conceivable do you think it is that an ambulance sitting 30 feet
away from 110-story, 500,000-ton, WTC 1 would be un-smashed, resting on an un-damaged parking structure, and
be taller than the rubble pile around it? Something (probably involving black-op FE) turned those buildings to dust.
An ambulance sits essentially undamaged on
the ground maybe 100 feet in front of World Trade Center Building 1 after
it and Building 2 have "collapsed". Image source: BreakForNews.com.
Pure Energy Systems News
In her book, Where
did the Towers Go: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11
Dr. Judy Wood has compiled an amazing collection of photos, videos, statements, and data that convey a very convincing theory that the World Trade Center towers were not brought down just by jets flying into them and the resulting fires, as portrayed as the official
story. Nor were they brought down just by
pre-positioned, controlled demolition charges, as portrayed by many in the 9/11 Truth movement.
Rather, she concludes that they were not "brought down", but rather were turned to dust
before hitting the ground, via some kind of black budget, directed energy weapon technology not acknowledged to exist by any military on
earth. The effect exhibits characteristics of Tesla
technologies. This was address recently in Jesse Ventura's "Death
Ray" episode of his Conspiracy
In my opinion, one of the most compelling photos in support of this model is the ambulance parked on ground level in front of
World Trade Center (WTC) Building 1. Other than some dust on top of it, and a
door slightly askew, it appears to be undamaged -- while you would expect it to be as flat as a pancake,
far out of view, buried deep under a pile of rubble.
No, it wasn't driven there after the building came down. There isn't a path
clear enough for that, though that would be even more amazing (that a drivable
path would be open that close to the disintegrated building).
Still, at maybe 8 feet (2.4 meters) high, the in-tact ambulance is actually higher than a lot of
the rubble found around it.
You can even see the ground next to the ambulance.
With a push broom, and lifting a few small chunks of rubble by hand, in five
minutes, you could clear a spot on the still-flat ground next to the ambulance
large enough to lay down a blanket and have a picnic. (A dust mask would be
highly recommended, though at least you probably wouldn't have to worry about
You would expect that if a 110 story building with 500,000 tons of material had just
fallen next to it, either by catastrophic collapse or controlled demolition, that there would be approximately 12+ stories of rubble at the base.
Even if a one- or two-story building had come down next to an ambulance via a severe earthquake, for example, its rubble would be higher than the ambulance.
Yet in this case not just one, but two 1200-foot-tall buildings have just "come
down" in this vicinity.
When I say "vicinity", I would estimate that the ambulance is parked
approximately 30 feet away from what used to be WTC1. One could argue that distance is hard
to judge in this photo shot with a telephoto lens.
However, an aerial view of this same location gives a clear perspective, and
shows how close the ambulance was to the building that is no more.
In the video below, at time stamp 0:30, you see close-up, aerial video footage of the ambulance that gives a clear indication of the proximity of the ambulance to the tower. A line of firemen are walking nearby on what remains flat ground of ground level, littered with some
rubble around the now-gone
Look carefully at that footage and note how flat the ground is. You can still make out the ground through the rubble. It's not an uneven, 12-plus-story heap of concrete, metal, glass, marble, tile, office equipment, bodies, carpet, ceiling tiles.
Most all of that has been turned to dust and blown away or settled. Essentially the only in-tact item to make it through in significant quantity is paper.
One of the workers interviewed the next day said that the highest pile of debris was not more than three stories high.
(Part II; 5:13) A
fireman being interviewed next to WTC 1 or 2 the following day mentions: "110
stories at ground level," as he stands on what looks like a clear parking
lot (Part II; 5:05)
with a sparse amount of debris and an untouched ambulance parked maybe 30 feet
from the building, as if in a normal situation. (That ambulance may have been
brought in later?)
A lot of the early commentary on television the day following the buildings' demise
(prior to being given their talking points by their higher ups, to cover up the
crime) was about the stark lack of rubble. The title of Judy's book: "Where did the Towers Go?" was actually repeated
in effect several times by news anchors, such as Peter Jennings and George
(video), as they puzzled over the lack of the amount of solid debris you would expect.
ABC reporter Robert Krulwich said:
"Engineers at the firm that built the buildings, best guess to account for the missing 1200 feet of material from each tower, is that
large portions simply vaporized into the dust that rained down on New Yorkers immediately after the collapse. It was that powerful. We are talking here about 43,600 windows, 600,000 sq. ft. of glass, 200,000 tons of structural steel, 5 million sq. ft. of gypsum, 6 acres of marble and 425,000 cubic yards of concrete
turned in good part into a cloud, says Environmental Medical Doctor, Dr. Stephen Levin [from Mt. Sinai Hospital]."
(Part I; 4:15)
The ABC report continues:
"But most interesting, in the mix, they are looking, they think, at specs of steel that used to be beams and elevators, marble, and the lobby floor, and facings, so what were once the strongest architectural elements in the two towers, were pulverized. Large portions
turned into clouds, like this one.
"Still there is this mystery. If some of the hardest materials were vaporized, how to account for the presence everywhere of paper. Fully intact letters, business forms,
stationary. Paper is so fragile, and combustible, and yet, somehow, maybe because we have so much of it, it was everywhere."
(Part I; 5:40)
Pre-Conceived Notions vs Reality
For years, based on the limited information I had, when I visualized the
"pile" that represented the rubble from what used to be Buildings 1,
2, and 7, I pictured a heap that smashed through the basement, and rose in
disarray from the bedrock upward. I didn't know until reading Judy's book that
other WTC buildings were also hugely affected.
- 22-story, WTC 3: completely gone except for one little corner.
- 9-story WTC 4, 3/4 gone, to the ground, with one wing remaining.
- 8-story WTC 6, half gone, to the ground, cored out in the middle,
but not its edges.
- 9-story WTC 5 was essentially the only one remaining mostly intact, except
for what appears to be limited crushing damage from sizeable fragments.
So it wasn't just WTC 1,2 and 7 that went down that day. But not only is
there a lack of a 12-story heap from Buildings 1 and 2, towering over the
remnants of the smaller Buildings 4, 5, and 6; but an aerial view shows the surface level to
still be mostly ground level. Of course by the time this photo was taken 16 days
later, a lot of wreckage had already been hauled away. But at least you see that
the ground is not an irregular shaped heap, deformed from the "falling
buildings", which is what you would expect if those buildings had actually
collapsed and not gone mostly to dust.
Sky view of WTC wreckage on September 27. Click for enlargement.
Source: Wood insert, and p. 147, fig. 144.
Reality is very different from that. In the above samples, you see footage
of a largely flat surface, punctuated with some rubble, not an uneven, chaotic
Previously, I would have thought that anything that might appear to be at
"ground level" would be a function of a heap of rubble that smashed
through the basement levels below.
In reality, the basement went largely unscathed -- nearly as untouched as the
ambulance in the first photo above.
Here is a news clipping that says: "Engineers find much of the seven-story basement is intact."
(Part I: 9:24)
Yes, there were uneven areas where ground level was breached and gaped into
the basement. However, the "Bathtub" on which the WTC complex
was built, to keep the waters from the nearby Hudson River from inundating the
complex, went essentially unscathed. Here you see a view of the bathtub walls
after it had been cleaned out.
(Wood, p. 120, figure 117)
It had more damage from the earthmovers excavating out the rubble than it did
from the 1.2 million tons of WTC Building 1 and 2 "falling" on it.
So, back to the ambulance. Not only was it sitting un-smashed in front of WTC2,
but it was sitting on top of a basement structure that was still in place,
How conceivable do you think it is that an ambulance sitting 30 feet away from
110-story, 500,000-ton, WTC 1 would be un-smashed, resting on an un-damaged parking
structure (at least there), and be taller than the rubble pile around it?
The official story certainly doesn't explain that, but neither does the
"controlled demolition" version. The only explanation that is
consistent with that factual observation is that, for the most part, the
buildings didn't hit the ground but were turned to dust. That is what the
replete visual evidence shows.
As chunks of building material are catapulted away from the building, you can
see them disintegrating, with dust billowing from them as they fall.
Look at this one, from page 138 of Judy's book. The red arrow points to a
large chunk of material that disintegrates as it falls, from the left frame to
So, why was nanothermite found in the dust, if these building's weren't
brought down by controlled demolition? (Steven E. Jones, peer-reviewed paper Active
Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center
Catastrophe, published in The
Open Chemical Physics Journal on April 3rd, 2009, which describes that nanothermite,
a high-tech, military grade explosive, was used during the destruction of the
WTC Twin Towers and Building 7.)
I'll get to that in a follow-up report, in which I proposed that
Building 7 came
down through more conventional means, and that is why the nanothermite showed
up. And, perhaps, some nanothermite along with conventional explosives were used
to pre-cut Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 to make them easier for the directed
energy weapons to finish them off into dust. Hence the appearance of squibs in
advance of the "collapsing" portion.
The fall of Building 7 looked nothing like the vaporization of Buildings 1 and 2.
And the pile Building 7 left was deeper, resembling more closely what you would
expect from controlled demolition.
Compare depth of debris pile from Building 7 on far left, to WTC 1 on far right, with 8-story WTC 6 between them. But also note that sidewalk level is essentially maintained next to the U.S. Post Office at the top left of the photo. (Source: Wood, p. 20, fig. 19).
Judy argues against this, saying that Building 7 was also brought down the
same way as the other buildings, but I don't buy her argument, for reasons I'll
elaborate in a follow-up report. The strongest support for her argument is that
the seismic signature of Building 7 was a mere 0.6 on the Richter scale
(Seismology Group, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University; Wood,
p. 65) -- barely registering above background -- which is consistent with the
removal of the weight of the building from the ground, but not of the building
crashing to the ground.
Buildings 2 and 1 had seismic signatures of 2.3 and 2.1, lasting 8 and 10
seconds, respectively, roughly the time it would take a bowling ball to drop
free-fall from the top of a 110-story building. Those numbers are also
consistent the the removal of a 500,000-ton weight from the earth over that
duration, not of that mass collapsing to the earth. (Wood, chapter 6.)
I've been sitting on this story for about a month, wanting to write something
up. It's a huge subject with a lot of supporting information, not all of it easy
Finally, I decided to just go ahead and publish what I have so far, and then do
some follow-up pieces later.
The above is labeled "Part I" because I plan to do several
follow-up reports on this dustification theme, including the following topics:
- At least two methods used: controlled demolition (Building 7) and directed
energy weaponry (WTC 1,2,3,4,6). Hence the occurrence of nanothermite in the
- Analogues between the Hutchison Effect and what was observed on
Source: Wood, pp. 380-381 and pp. 470-471.
- Earth's magnetic field fluctuations directly correspond to 9/11
events, supporting directed energy weapons model.
- Category 3, Hurricane Erin, off shore during 9/11 events, a likely
context to support the function of the directed energy weaponry. Hurricane
is barely acknowledged, to the point of appearing like a cover-up.
- Steven Jones is not a "disinformation agent". He
sincerely believes that controlled demolition, using nanothermite along with
conventional explosives, was used to bring down the towers, based on the
evidence he has personally witnessed and studied. (See my November 19, 2012 report
about his reasons for saying that what people are calling "cold
fusion" isn't "fusion.")
|FAIR USE NOTICE: The above images may contain copyrighted (© ) material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit
[the revenue from advertising will just offset the expense of memory and
bandwidth for a page this size with this much material] to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
# # #
What You Can Do
- See Suggestions for How to Get Involved with the Roll-out of Exotic Free Energy
- Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
- Click to Tweet: http://clicktotweet.com/If40e
- Donate to PES Network
to help us keep this news and directory and networking service going.
- Subscribe to our newsletter
to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy