Free Energy is all about freedom:
Power to the people -- literally and figuratively



 "Free Energy" 

News XML
- PESN Specials
- About
- Pure Energy Blog
- Daily FE News
- Features
- Free Energy Now
- This Week in FE
- Newsletter
- How you can help
- Submit  
- Subscribe

 

Directory
Energy Topics

• Alt Fuels
• Anti-Gravity
• Batteries
• Betavoltaic
• Biofuels
 - BioDiesel
 - BioElectricity
 - Biomass
• Body Electric
• Brown's Gas
• Cold Fusion
• Conservation
• Electrolysis
• Electromagnetic OU
• Fuel Cells
• Fuel Efficiency
 - Electric Vehicles
 - Engines
 - Hydroxy
• Fusion
• Geothermal
• Gravity Motors
• Human Powered
• Hydro
• Hydrogen
• Joe Cells
• Lighting
• Magnet Motors
• Nanotechnology
• Nuclear
• Nucl. Remediation
• Oil
• Piezoelectric
• Plasma
• River
• Salt Water Mix
• Solar
• Solid State Gen.
• Tesla Turbines
• Thermal Electric
• Tidal
• Vortex
• Waste to Energy
• Water
 - Water as Fuel
• Wave
• Wind
• Wireless Electricity
• Zero Point Energy
• MORE . . .

Open Source
• Freddy's Cell
• Bedini SG
• Safe Haven Villages
• MORE . . .

Resources
• Awards
• Conservation
• Conspiracy
• Directories
• Investment
• Kudos
• Legal
• Organizations
• Plastic and Energy
• Recycling
• Suppression
• Tools
• Trends
• MORE . . .

Mingling
• OverUnity Forum
• Employment
• Events
• Humor
• Magazines
• Movies
• Newsletters
• Discuss. Groups

Shopping
• Store
• Buyer Beware
- - - - - - - - - -
- Donate
- Contact

 

 

 


/2011/11/28/9601964_Climategate_2.0--Politics_of_Science_Trumping_Left_and_Right/
You are here:
PureEnergySystems.com > News > November 27, 2011 10:00 pm MST

OPINION:
Climategate 2.0 -- Politics of Science Trumping Left and Right

The same elite scientific establishment that prostituted themselves to promote "global warming" for political reasons, disregarding science (and who support the 9/11 official story); is the same corrupted scientific establishment that has said "cold fusion is impossible." Don't buy their lies. They are liars, as proven. Free energy is possible. The universe is full of it.

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

On the two year anniversary of the first go-around, Climategate is back in the news, this time being called Climategate 2.0, with a fresh batch of 5,000 incriminating emails from the scientific establishment who are shown to be nothing more than shills for the political establishment instead of pillars of scientific objectivity that they are presented to be and are supposed to be.

On Saturday I posted a link from the alternative media about this, then Sunday morning, I posted a link to a story from the Daily Mail about this, then by late afternoon, when updating our Climategate page, I saw that this story is circulating widely in the press, headed by an article in the Wall Street Journal that nailed it in conciseness and frankness, so I linked to that one as well.

Then it occurred to me that some extrapolative commentary was in order, so I posted the following bullet in our news:

  • Global Warming > Conspiracy > Climategate >
    NOTE on Scientific Prostitution - The same elite scientific establishment that prostituted themselves to promote "global warming" for political reasons, disregarding science (and who support the 9/11 official story); is the same corrupted scientific establishment that has said "cold fusion is impossible." Don't buy their lies. They are liars, as now proven. Free energy is possible. The universe is full of it. -- Sterling D. Allan; November 28, 2011

After posting that, I decided that the opportunity to do an exposι on the scientific establishment was just too great to pass, hence this present article. That "note" needs and deserves embellishment.

It doesn't take a lot of reading to see that this Climate 2.0 thing is a blatant case of scientific prostitution. Renowned scientists, for the sake of a political agenda leveraged by financial blackmail (follow the money), have been pushing bogus science and persecuting those with contrary views. It is corruption, plain and simple, with the objective of using the alleged threat of "global warming" as a common cause around which to rally the masses into global police state purposes -- in this case, a global carbon tax and carbon swap schemes. Those ploys are no more legitimate or beneficial than the bogus real estate derivatives trading that has gone on as one of the primary drivers of the recent economic mess the world is in. These knowing perpetrators ought to be brought to justice and serve time for their crimes against humanity, for breaching the trust that was put in them, leading to billions of dollars in bogus programs, hyped regulations, etc... 

And the fat daddies who pulled their financial strings ought to be included in those indictments, as being the most culpable. It's long overdue for names like Rockefeller, Rothschild, and Strong to serve hard time. And the favored mouthpiece, Al Gore, the quintessential hypocrite with his many million-dollar ranches and yachts, should be one of the first to go. A Nobel Prize in hypocrisy could be established in his name, as his name historically will demonstrate the political hypocrisy of many of those awards.

The fact that there was no housecleaning after Climategate 1.0 shows that the establishment has no intention of even pretending to set things straight, but is confident in its ability to keep pulling things over on the gullible public (not realizing that the public is getting less gullible to their criminality).


Lying Elsewhere Too

Is climate research the only area where scientists have sold out? Hardly.

Consider the following sampling:

  • Scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado, where my dad worked while I was growing up; completely prostituted themselves in their analysis of why WTC Building 7 fell on 9/11. They served as cover-up agents of their paymasters in the federal government. I prepared a page about this two years ago. 
    You don't need a degree in science to see that building 7 fell from pre-placed demolition charges. The evidence is overwhelming. And the number of professionals who have signed (e.g. 1,637 architects and engineers) their names to that fact is growing, now numbering in the many thousands. Bear in mind the courage it takes to stand up like this, so for every one signature there are probably another 100 - 1000 professionals who agree but don't want to jeopardize their career (including my Dad, who agrees but hasn't signed yet) -- because of the POLITICS of this matter, headed by NIST.
    There ought to be heads rolling there too, starting with John Gross, the lead engineer, who told a press conference that there was no evidence or witnesses of explosions, when FOIA disclosures proved that NIST was sitting on tons of such evidence but willfully (obediently) chose to ignore it.
  • There there is the case of NASA who puts on a show of the U.S. putting forth a token effort to get into space, when behind the scenes, in multi-trillion dollar black-budget programs, anti-gravity technology has been reverse engineered and implemented, powered by free energy technology for decades now; so that many of the "UFO" craft people see are actually of human origin -- a fact that is covered up by governments, in collusion with science. 
    How many scientists truly believe that UFOs are bogus and such capabilities are impossible, when modern science itself is on the brink of such capabilities? So once again science has prostrated itself to politics rather than truth. NASA is a scam, not the quintessence of human achievement.
  • A significant hit piece could be written of how the mainstream scientific community went with uranium nuclear power, instead of thorium. The reason? Political. Uranium-based power can be weaponized. Thorium cannot.
  • Natural News is continually cranking out excellent documentation about scientists who prostitute themselves in allowing excellent health remedies to be hindered, while marginal or even toxic products are approved; all for monetary control and gain; while jeopardizing human health worldwide.
  • Ditto for GMO seeds, which are not only becoming a criminal monopoly, but are jeopardizing the entire biosphere for possibly centuries to come. At least in Europe, they have woken up and are banning these, while in the U.S., Monsanto still reigns supreme.


Lying about Free Energy

So, after considering the above points, how inclined are you to believe that scientists are telling you the truth when they say things like "cold fusion is impossible". Or "cold fusion has never been replicated."

As of a year ago, Jed Rothwell, founder of http://lenr-canr.org, estimates the number of replications worldwide at 17,000.  (See his tally of hundreds of published scientific papers.)

Someone is lying.

Is it the scientific establishment or Jed Rothwell?

Just ask one of the many researchers who has replicated the effect. Only one bona fide instance makes the establishment position fallacious. I've talked to many who claim to have replicated the effect. And on October 28th, I witnessed Andrea Rossi's cold fusion E-Cat plant in operation as it was being tested in Bologna by the first commercial customer, who was satisfied with the results. According to Rossi, the customer's report said it ran at 479 kilowatts on average for five and a half hour in self-sustain mode (no external power supplied other than for the pumps and fans, which were maybe a few kilowatts). And they purchased 13 of the 1 MW plants.

Here's some additional evidence of politics in cold fusion science. A memo from the U.S. Patent Office has been published that calls for the file wrapper of any patent applications relating to cold fusion be stamped with "cold fusion". And according to Thomas Valone, who is a patent examiner, such a stamp typically constitutes a death sentence for acceptance of the patent. He himself was let go from the patent office in 1999 because of holding a cold fusion seminar. After a six year battle, he won his job back with back pay. [Link]

Is that merely scientific dogma or politics at play, with corruption undertones?

If you are a scientist, what do you think? Objectively, given the dichotomy of information between what the "establishment" position is, and what is happening in the real world, against great odds, who do you believe?

As for heads rolling, I would nominate Bob Parks to be one of the first indicted to serve time for his corruption in calling cold fusion "junk science," a label that the scientific establishment has adopted as their dogma up to this day.

It only takes a small minority of "respected" but corrupted leaders to steer an entire field astray. The rest follow suit via the mechanisms of 

  • Pulling the finance strings.
  • Peer pressure to follow the crowd.
  • Ridicule of the "undesirable" science.

A similar story could be told about the many other genres of free energy now emerging.


Corruption

It doesn't take a lot to steer an entire civilization, when people of influence put their morals on hold in order to get along with what their conscience is rejecting. And the more people are willing to do this, the more the evil takes hold.

America once was great because America was good, generally speaking. America is no long good, nor is America great any more.

If that stature is to be restored by America, or any country, then goodness must be restored.


Free Energy is Real

Don't believe the scientists who say free energy is "impossible". Either they are lying, being privy to any number of working free energy technologies, either in the black budget or which they suppressed or otherwise sequestered somewhere for their own use; or they are just patsies going along with the mantra of their leaders who pay their salaries.

This you can know for sure: the mainstream scientific establishment cannot be trusted. It is a sad reality in today's very corrupt world. Mainstream science has became a cultish religion.

Think for yourself.

When you look at Building 7 coming down, can you honestly say that it doesn't look like a classical demolition job?

Get a conscience and get a dose of reality. You are being lied to left and right.


A Great Division

A sub-theme in the above article could be the great divide between corruption and goodness.

In each of the instances you see the following elements:

  • Corrupt elements infiltrating and taking control of the "establishment" position.
  • Resistance within the field to that corruption.
  • Marginalization of the resistance through ridicule, ostracizing, suppression.
  • Eventual victory of the resistance through persistence, faith, and exposing the lie.

It's time to make a choice as to which side you will be on.


Free Energy Revolution

Join the revolution. Support truth. 

Support free energy. It is a primary mechanism by which people can be empowered against the powers that be, who are largely tied into the polluting energy sources. 

If you have a device in your garage that can power your house 24/7/364, with no fuel required other than what comes freely, inexhaustibly from nature, then what power does the establishment have over you? A whole lot less than if you are plugged into their grid. Ditto for your car. Ditto for your electronic devices. Ditto for your garden, which can get its water from your free energy device that filters and distills water from air, or pumps it from a well, or desalinates it from the ocean.

Ignore the liars and patsies who say these things are "impossible." They are wrong.

This is a time for empowerment of the individual, for a return to goodness, for a return to principles of freedom. Free energy literally gives "power to the people." You don't need to rely on mainstream science for your scientific truths. Open your eyes and get involved.

# # #

This story is also published at BeforeItsNews and Examiner.

What You Can Do

  1. Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
  2. Share via Twitter: http://clicktotweet.com/lL4c0 
  3. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy sector.

See also

Resources at PESWiki.com

Page composed by Sterling D. Allan
Last updated September 04, 2012
 
 

Ads

 

 

NOTE: We are presently moderating all comments, to keep out the crass negativity, flaming, and other inappropriate forms of criticism. We welcome constructive criticism tactfully stated. Frequent offenders will be blacklisted.

"It is harder to crack a prejudice than an atom." // "I'd rather be an optimist and a fool than a pessimist and right."
-- Albert Einstein

ADVISORY: With any technology, you take a high risk to invest significant time or money unless (1) independent testing has thoroughly corroborated the technology, (2) the group involved has intellectual rights to the technology, and (3) the group has the ability to make a success of the endeavor.
Schopenhauer
All truth passes through three stages:
   First, it is ridiculed;
   Second, it is violently opposed; and
   Third, it is accepted as self-evident.

-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    "When you're one step ahead
of the crowd you're a genius.
When you're two steps ahead,
you're a crackpot."

-- Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, (Feb. 1998)

Submit • Privacy • About • Contact

PESWiki Departments:
Latest • News •XMLFeed • Directory • Congress • Top 5 • Open Sourcing • PowerPedia

PESN.com
Copyright © 2002-2014, PES Network Inc.