The following open letter was submitted by Dr. Stoyan Sarg to PESN for publication.
Dr. Stoyan Sarg holds his book: Field Propulsion by Control of Gravity
The expansion of nuclear power during the past 60 years was dominated by the opinion that there is no alternative to nuclear energy. Presently it provides about 14% of the total energy. The policy makers even envisioned that this would be the energy of the future. The dangerous consequences, however, were not correctly predicted. They include nuclear catastrophes from earthquakes, terrorist attacks, nuclear weapons acquired by rogue regimes and contamination from radioactive waste. During the last one and a half year the average rate of the earthquakes increased 3 times and this trend continues. The main reason for the adopted energy strategy was the lack of fundamental research on alternatives to nuclear energy. Presently, the total number of commercial nuclear reactors in the world is 442, the number of research reactors is 250 and the number of reactors in ships and submarines is 180. By countries:
there alternative options that can replace nuclear power? From a scientific
point of view, a solution exists, but it has been neglected for decades.
Specifically, we must re-evaluate what is currently being taught in the
universities concerning the concept of space as the physical vacuum. The
concept of the physical vacuum adopted at the beginning of the 20th century
does not correspond to reality. That is why a wide range of phenomena cannot be
explained logically. While human logic is blamed for the failure, the enigmas
themselves are indications that some of the adopted assumptions are wrong.
Since mathematical logic does not have the restrictions of physical
reality, abstract theories can be built which are based on wrong assumptions.
But sooner or later, physical phenomena will be encountered that cannot be
explained by such theories. This kind of physics does not offer a complete
understanding of processes in the micro cosmos. According to current teaching in
physics, nuclear energy arises from the nuclear forces, yet
the physical origin of these forces is a mystery. Why? This is because
according to the currently adopted concept the space is empty, while at the same
time it has quantum mechanical properties. Many physics scholars are not aware
that in 1922 Albert Einstein came to the conclusion that there is an
indispensable need for a space-filling ether. According to the
general theory of relativity, space is endowed with physical qualities; in this
sense, therefore, there exists an Ether. According to the general theory of
relativity, space without ether is unthinkable (page 23) .
Much accumulated evidence now indicates that space contains an unique superfine
but dense lattice structure whose elements are far beyond the reach of the most
powerful electron microscopes. It possesses not only quantum mechanical
properties but also defines the speed of light, the relativistic effects, the
propagation of Newtonian gravitation, inertia, and the electrical and magnetic
fields. In contemporary physics, only some of the properties
of this structure are described by mathematical expressions, while its existence
is dismissed. This leads to incomplete knowledge of some essential physical
processes at the level of the micro cosmos.
correct understanding of these processes is of vital importance now at the time
of the global energy crisis. The main question is: Is there a safer replacement
for nuclear energy? The correct answer is
Yes! It comes from the revised concept of space the physical vacuum [5,6,7].
The superfine structure of the physical vacuum is a source of two types of
primary energy: (1) Static Energy not of EM type related to gravitational
mass with a detectable signature - Casimir Forces; (2) Dynamic type of energy (lower amount),
which is behind the electrical and magnetic fields and has a detectable
signature of 2.72K estimated from the Cosmic
Microwave Background [6, Chapter 5]. THE STATIC TYPE OF
ENERGY IS THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF THE NUCLEAR ENERGY. IT IS NOT CONTAINED IN
NUCLEI BUT IS UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED IN SPACE, SO EVERY CUBIC CM CONTAINS 1.37
E20 JOULES = 3.8 E13 (KWH) OF THIS ENERGY. IT IS ALSO THE SOURCE OF THE DYNAMIC
TYPE OF ENERGY, KNOWN AS ZERO POINT ENERGY (ZPE), WHICH COULD BE REACHED BY
SPECIFIC ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS.
alternative solution for replacement of the energy from nuclear plants will come
from development of other methods and techniques for extracting energy from the
primary source (1) mentioned above. The theoretical understanding of this non-EM
type of energy is elaborated in the treatise BSM Supergravitation Unified
Theory (BSM-SG) .
The theory also describes the structural features of the electron 
that permitted to suggest a method for accessing this hidden space energy. The
method, called the Heterodyne Resonance Mechanism,
involves an electromagnetically activated plasma where quantum mechanical
interactions occur between oscillating ion-electron pairs and the space-time
continuum. Other alternatives to
nuclear power, such as Cold Fusion and Torsion technologies, access the same
primary source and they also lack official support .
the university text books of the past 50 years, information that could challenge
the validity of the ether concept was gradually excluded, so generations of
physicist are presently unaware of the problems discussed amongst physicists in
the first half of the 20th century. Since the ether was not accepted,
it could not be envisioned as the primary source of nuclear energy. This has had
a direct impact on research that might lead to alternatives to nuclear power.
Although such research has not been officially funded, it has been addressed by
some lone researchers and research groups. In the time of the Internet, this new
research, known as free energy, zero point energy, or energy from the vacuum,
has spread to different countries. It involves individuals or collaborating
groups. Without funded scientific research, however, the physics is not well
understood and the positive results are sporadic or not reproducible. The lack
of official support, as well as opposition from some established scientific
groups, diverts attention from this research. One additional concern, expressed
by us, is the need for simultaneous research on the side effects. When exceeding
some power level the Zeropoint energy devices may radiate scalar (longitudinal)
waves that have some biological effects. Most individual researchers are not
aware of this issue. One should remember that the adoption of nuclear energy,
for example, was preceded by decades of scientific research on radioactivity. Consequently: The new technology based
on the energy from the physical vacuum may not be suitable for use in the home,
so it should still be centralized. The most suitable location initially will be
the nuclear plant locations, where the existing infrastructure may be used for
Environmental damage with health consequences from a nuclear catastrophe is a more immediate threat than global warming. Alternatives to nuclear energy based on methods not recognized so far must be considered, such as the possibility of accessing the energy of the physical vacuum by the Heterodyne Resonance Mechanism. The need for scientific research on these alternatives must be officially recognized and funded. Implementations of promising technologies could be made available in the very near future. The safer replacement of nuclear energy will not eliminate the need for oil but could ease the tension caused by gradually shrinking oil resources.
List of most dangerous radioactive products. The video 
shows how they are detected and the units of measurements.
half-life of 8 days, accumulates in the thyroid gland
- half-life of 3.25 yrs, and Cesium-137 half-life of 30 yrs, water soluble,
penetrates into the soil and the food chain through plants and animals, causes
half-life of 30 yrs, penetrates through skin, in bone marrow causes
half-life of 14.4 yrs, the main and most dangerous product of the nuclear
fuel, difficult to detect alpha emitter. A micrograms dose of Plutonium leads to
ill conditions, with a life expectancy of less than ten years .
Stoyan Sarg Sargoytchev,
35 years in space research institutions of Europe, USA and Canada, currently
with York University, Toronto,
experimenter and theorist, author of monographs: BSM-SG Unified Theory and Field
Propulsion by Control of Gravity, international collaborator with ZPE
research groups, over 80 scientific publications.
Dr. Asparuh Petrakiev (two doctorates), a
retired professor who has had a broad international collaboration, (professor in
Department of Nuclear Physics, Sofia University, /1963-78/, senior fellow
researcher in KFA-Julich, Germany as
a member of the International Agency for
Atomic Energy, Vienna /1974-75/), a member of the International Academy of Ecology and Life Protection Science, over
300 scientific publications.
Dott. Arch, President of the Planetary
Association for Clean Energy, a Canadian Learned Society and an
international collaborative network of advanced scientific thinking with an
emphasis on peer review of fundamentals of advanced physics and electrodynamics.
Over 100 scientific publications.
Novosibirsk, Russia, former Director of the Filial of Sibirs Center for
Anomalous Phenomena, Novosibirsk, multidisciplinary research including:
mechanisms of chemical reaction radiolysis, termolysis, photolysis, and
search for new energy sources.
Dr. Todor Proychev, a retired professor with an European international collaboration in the field of control engineering, over 60 scientific publications.
Balaskas, Physicist, nuclear plant operator trainee and seismologist, currently
Petrovic, O. Eng. PgMP, PMP Secretary for
Marrett, Physicist, Heliognosis, ZPE researcher,
Treurniet, Research scientist (retired), Communications Research Centre,
Turrell, expertise in the radioactive contamination of environment, Millennium
Knud Jespersen, Engineer, Former President of Infinite Energy Corp.,
Kennedy, Engineer, President of WCI Environmental Solutions Inc.,
Penev, Engineer, alternative energy researcher,
Dechev, Engineer, alternative energy researcher,
A. Rutke, Lasertek Precision
The True Battle of Chernobyl Uncensored, http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5384001427276447319#
 A. V. Yablokov, V. B.
Nesterenko, A. V. Nesterenko, Chernobyle Consequences of the Catastrophe for
People and the Environment, N. Y. Academy of Sciences, (2009), Amazon.com
 A. Einstein, Sidelights on
Relativity, translated by: G. B. Jeffery and W. Perret, Methuen & Co.
S. Sarg, Basic Structures of Matter Supergravitation Unified Theory,
NLC archive 2002, Trafford Publ. (2006)
S. Sarg, Physical model of the electron according to BSM, Physics essays, v. 16,
No 2, 180-185, (2003)
S. Sarg, Field propulsion by control of gravity theory and experiments,
 E. Mallove, Open letter to
the World, (2004), http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obituaries/2004/EugeneMallove/LastMessage040513
George L. "Plutonium and Health: How great is the risk?". Los
Alamos Science (Los Alamos (NM):
# # #
Resources at PESWiki.com
|Page composed by Sterling
D. Allan May 10, 2011
Last updated September 04, 2012