• MES50 QMoGen appears to be for sale in Russia
• Chrysler bought then blocked magnet fuel improvement technology
• TWIFE™ -- Featuring David Puchta's Blew-Me Fuels from Saltwater
• Gaia-Energy -- Global Association for Independent Energy & Altruism
• Free Energy News Disappears

 "Free Energy" 

News XML
- PESN Specials
- About
- Pure Energy Blog
- Daily FE News
- Features
- Free Energy Now
- This Week in FE
- Newsletter
- How you can help
- Submit  
- Subscribe


Energy Topics

• Alt Fuels
• Anti-Gravity
• Batteries
• Betavoltaic
• Biofuels
 - BioDiesel
 - BioElectricity
 - Biomass
• Body Electric
• Brown's Gas
• Cold Fusion
• Conservation
• Electrolysis
• Electromagnetic OU
• Fuel Cells
• Fuel Efficiency
 - Electric Vehicles
 - Engines
 - Hydroxy
• Fusion
• Geothermal
• Gravity Motors
• Human Powered
• Hydro
• Hydrogen
• Joe Cells
• Lighting
• Magnet Motors
• Nanotechnology
• Nuclear
• Nucl. Remediation
• Oil
• Piezoelectric
• Plasma
• River
• Salt Water Mix
• Solar
• Solid State Gen.
• Tesla Turbines
• Thermal Electric
• Tidal
• Vortex
• Waste to Energy
• Water
 - Water as Fuel
• Wave
• Wind
• Wireless Electricity
• Zero Point Energy
• MORE . . .

Open Source
• Freddy's Cell
• Bedini SG
• Safe Haven Villages
• MORE . . .

• Awards
• Conservation
• Conspiracy
• Directories
• Investment
• Kudos
• Legal
• Organizations
• Plastic and Energy
• Recycling
• Suppression
• Tools
• Trends
• MORE . . .

• OverUnity Forum
• Employment
• Events
• Humor
• Magazines
• Movies
• Newsletters
• Discuss. Groups

• Store
• Buyer Beware
- - - - - - - - - -
- Donate
- Contact




You are here:
PureEnergySystems.com > News > August 7, 2007

Click flag to translate

in English in Japanese in Chinese in Korean en Franηais en Espaρol no Portuκs in Italiano auf Deutsch

Top 100
Horizontal versus Vertical Axis Ocean Turbines

A review of the leading tidal power technologies and a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the horizontal axis design versus the vertical axis design.

by Adrian Akau
for Pure Energy Systems News

Slashdot   Slashdot It!   StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Blue Energy tide turbine diagram

Jim Murray and Paul Babcock's 4790% SERPS Presentation

Ignition Secrets DVD by Aaron Murakami 

A&P Electronic Media

Magnetic Energy Secrets, Paul Babcock, Parts 1 & 2

Battery Secrets by Peter Lindemann


Vertical Axis Ocean Turbines (VAOT) compared to Horizontal Axis Ocean Turbines (HAOT)

Vertical Axis Ocean Turbines have been proposed by FreeFlow69, a new company in Cornwall England for the San Francisco Bay area and the Bristol Channel in England. The question this article wishes to examine is whether it is possible to access relative merits of the VAOT as proposed and to compare it with HAOT technologies presently being tested or developed. 

The FreeFlow Osprey VAOT is proposed to work in a multiple system. It would have its gearbox and generator above the water level and be anchored in place where tidal currents are strong. An individual VAOT would be designed similar to the Blue Energy tide turbine.

Blade sections might also be designed as follows:

Wind/Water Turbine
Windaus Vertical Axis Wind Turbine

The Osprey plant is proposed to link a number of vertical axis turbines linked together for underwater generation of power with fixed wind turbines above:

The orange knobs in the center are the gearbox and electric generator of each Osprey.

The VAOT is in competition with several HAOT that are already being tested. Let us look at a few examples of the more common horizontal type:

Verdant's turbine producing power
in New York's East River.

The "Wando" type HAOT that the Voith Siemens Hydro Tidal Corporation (51% owenership) is preparing to construct with a plant in Wando, South Korea. Each of the three turbines is rated at 1 Mw and the plant is to manufacture 600 Mw of turbines per year. Note that the horizontal axis can swing 180 degrees as the current changes direction and that it can be raised above ocean level for repairs ("The crossbeam can be lifted from the water for maintenance purposes.").

The 1.2Mw SeaGen tidal energy system will commence testing during the week of August 20th in Northern Ireland’s Strangford Lough. It is a prototype for commercial technology to be replicated on a large scale over the next few years. Note that the clockwise and anticlockwise torque are in balance.

In comparing the VAOT type produced by FreeFlow to the standard HAOTs, we come to some general conclusions:

1. A VAOT having its gearbox and generator above sea level does not seem to have any advantage over the horizontal axis type. Both are subject to corrosion and the Osprey turbine and gearbox would have to be just as watertight as the Verdant, Wando or SeaGen units. What really counts is the energy of the currents passing through that can be converted.

2. The Wando and SeaGen units are designed to be raised out of the water for repairs by rotation on the horizontal axis in the case of the Wando and lifted vertically on the post for the SeaGen. The gearbox and electric generator portion would be accessible on the Osprey without lifting but a special hoist would have to be used to raise up the generator to examine the blade section. Normally, it is much safer to work on ocean current turbines out of the water since the currents are swift and can be dangerous. 

"Twix Hartland Point and Padstow Bay,
Is a sailor's grave by night or day."
(a saying about currents in the Bristol Channel)

3. The energy accumulators for the Osprey VAOTs which are to provide a narrow channel for the water to flow in order to increase its velocity may not prove cost effective. The Osprey Turbine may be of good design and function well, but the entire platform system seems bulky and unwieldy. The Verdant, Wando and SeaGen HAOT units seem less complex in overall design with both the Wando and SeaGen units set up for safe, above water repair. 

4. The introduction of wind turbines to the top of the VAOT energy accumulator platform would not seem to be cost effective in comparison to the system requirements, i.e. that the units be placed in areas of maximum current velocity and that these areas may or may not have suitable wind velocities. Also, floating platform wind turbines are outside the discussion of ocean current generating units at this time and the addition of wind generators to the VAOT's would not necessarily produce power at the same KWh rate. The idea here was to continue producing power during the change of tides since at that time, tide velocity reduces to zero before starting up in the opposite direction.

5. It would seem that just a few large Verdant, Wando or SeaGen type HAOTs would be adequate to replace an entire flotilla of Osprey VAOTs. If channeling is required for the VAOT's, then these additional costs should be included.

6. My tentative conclusion therefore is to prefer the design of the standard HAOT''s as I believe they would be less complex to install and safer to maintain. However, I believe the VAOT's such as the Osprey should also be tested. It is difficult to imagine a single VAOT being anchored in place due to the fact that the axis of the turbine itself is vertical. Therefore, the necessity of the anchored flotilla and probable increased cost of the system.

# # #

See also

Page poted by Sterling D. Allan August 7, 2007
Last updated August 08, 2007




NOTE: We are presently moderating all comments, to keep out the crass negativity, flaming, and other inappropriate forms of criticism. We welcome constructive criticism tactfully stated. Frequent offenders will be blacklisted.

"It is harder to crack a prejudice than an atom." // "I'd rather be an optimist and a fool than a pessimist and right."
-- Albert Einstein

ADVISORY: With any technology, you take a high risk to invest significant time or money unless (1) independent testing has thoroughly corroborated the technology, (2) the group involved has intellectual rights to the technology, and (3) the group has the ability to make a success of the endeavor.
All truth passes through three stages:
   First, it is ridiculed;
   Second, it is violently opposed; and
   Third, it is accepted as self-evident.

-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    "When you're one step ahead
of the crowd you're a genius.
When you're two steps ahead,
you're a crackpot."

-- Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, (Feb. 1998)

Submit • Privacy • About • Contact

PESWiki Departments:
Latest • News •XMLFeed • Directory • Congress • Top 5 • Open Sourcing • PowerPedia

Copyright © 2002-2014, PES Network Inc.