WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. A Purdue University examination committee reviewing
issues concerning research on the use of sound waves to create nuclear fusion
reactions has completed its work.
"The committee has submitted a report, and I will take appropriate action
after studying the recommendations," said Charles O. Rutledge, vice
president for research, who appointed the committee in March. "Any further
action in this matter will be conducted as an internal matter under appropriate
university procedures."
Rutledge appointed the examination committee after the British research journal
Nature reported on its Web site that some researchers had raised questions about
the research of Rusi Taleyarkhan, a Purdue professor of nuclear engineering.
Since joining the Purdue faculty in 2004 and previously at the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, Taleyarkhan has published research findings in several
refereed journals showing evidence that "sonofusion" generates nuclear
reactions by creating tiny bubbles that implode with tremendous force.
Experimental nuclear fusion reactors have historically required large,
multibillion-dollar machines, but sonofusion devices might be built for a
fraction of the cost and theoretically could be an unlimited source of clean
energy.
"Specific recommendations of the examination committee and any subsequent
steps by the university will be treated as confidential internal matters,"
Rutledge said.
In a statement issued at the time the committee was appointed, Provost Sally
Mason said: "Purdue is well aware that there are legitimate differences of
scientific opinion about the theories behind Dr. Taleyarkhan's work. Those
differences are the reason scientists share their findings.
"The research claims are very significant, and the allegations are very
serious. As in any scientific endeavor, Purdue's ultimate goals are truth and
integrity."
Taleyarkhan first reported observing the bubble fusion effect in March 2002 in
the journal Science. In addition to its potential as a new source of clean
energy, Taleyarkhan and other researchers believe sonofusion could be used in a
wide range of applications from homeland security to the study of neutron stars
and black holes.
# # #
Feedback
Not Exonerated
The following comment was received by email June 22, 2006.
Sterling, that PR is not really all that cryptic. Had Taleyarkhan
actually conducted high quality research, then one or more of the following
would have been evident:
1) Taleyarkhan could show how his ideas are consistent with accepted theory.
2) Taleyarkhan could show new science that goes beyond accepted theory by:
a) Showing experimental results inconsistent with existing theory, that
can be independently reproduced, AND
b) He has a hypothesis for that accounts for preexisting science and the
new experiments.
If the University could exonerate what amount to charges of academic fraud
against Taleyarkhan, you better believe that they would. That carefully
worded PR is academic speak for "Taleyarkhan sold us a bag of goods that we
should not have bought. The committee recommends disciplinary proceedings
against Taleyarkhan. The specifics will be kept in-house." Likely
Purdue is encouraging Taleyarkhan to leave quickly and quietly. Getting
snookered can do irrepairable damage to a University's reputation, ability to
get funding, and attract quality talent.
"Sonofusion" sounds remarkably like the 1996 movie "Chain
Reaction".
For a very sober view on how science is supposed to work and how it can ( and
has in the case of cold fusion ) become dysfunctional, read the 2002 piece:
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~dg/fusion_art.html
Dr. Goodstein explains that science is neither dogmatic adherence to accepted
theory, nor blind acceptance of new proclamations.
Penny Gruber <pennies_everywhere {at} hushmail.com>
See also