Features
• MES50 QMoGen appears to be for sale in Russia
• Chrysler bought then blocked magnet fuel improvement technology
• TWIFE™ -- Featuring David Puchta's Blew-Me Fuels from Saltwater
• Gaia-Energy -- Global Association for Independent Energy & Altruism
• Free Energy News Disappears



 "Free Energy" 

News XML
- PESN Specials
- About
- Pure Energy Blog
- Daily FE News
- Features
- Free Energy Now
- This Week in FE
- Newsletter
- How you can help
- Submit  
- Subscribe

 

Directory
Energy Topics

• Alt Fuels
• Anti-Gravity
• Batteries
• Betavoltaic
• Biofuels
 - BioDiesel
 - BioElectricity
 - Biomass
• Body Electric
• Brown's Gas
• Cold Fusion
• Conservation
• Electrolysis
• Electromagnetic OU
• Fuel Cells
• Fuel Efficiency
 - Electric Vehicles
 - Engines
 - Hydroxy
• Fusion
• Geothermal
• Gravity Motors
• Human Powered
• Hydro
• Hydrogen
• Joe Cells
• Lighting
• Magnet Motors
• Nanotechnology
• Nuclear
• Nucl. Remediation
• Oil
• Piezoelectric
• Plasma
• River
• Salt Water Mix
• Solar
• Solid State Gen.
• Tesla Turbines
• Thermal Electric
• Tidal
• Vortex
• Waste to Energy
• Water
 - Water as Fuel
• Wave
• Wind
• Wireless Electricity
• Zero Point Energy
• MORE . . .

Open Source
• Freddy's Cell
• Bedini SG
• Safe Haven Villages
• MORE . . .

Resources
• Awards
• Conservation
• Conspiracy
• Directories
• Investment
• Kudos
• Legal
• Organizations
• Plastic and Energy
• Recycling
• Suppression
• Tools
• Trends
• MORE . . .

Mingling
• OverUnity Forum
• Employment
• Events
• Humor
• Magazines
• Movies
• Newsletters
• Discuss. Groups

Shopping
• Store
• Buyer Beware
- - - - - - - - - -
- Donate
- Contact

 

 

 


http://pesn.com/2006/05/31/9500274_Star_Battery/
You are here:
PureEnergySystems.com > News > May 31, 2006

Star Battery Unveiled at 50th Anniversary of Russian Science Center

Technical data and patent numbers given for new Geteroelectric matter that efficiently collects energy in the visible and infrared regions, along with high-capacity, compact capacitor.

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

DUBNA, RUSSIA -- On May 25th, the world-renowned Russian Science Center celebrated its 50th year anniversary of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) by presenting a new "star battery" technology, which they describe as "revolutionary".

Invented by the scientists at the Scientific Center of Applied Research (SCAR) at JINR, the Star battery was produced on the basis of a new substance to be known as Geteroelectric matter ("heteroelectric" is probably a better translation, or "metamaterial"). It consists of a Geteroelectrical photoelement of high efficiency in the visible and infrared range. It has a Geteroelectrical capacitor with huge capacity while being very compact.

A geterogen substance consists of a carrier and an active element, a nanoparticle of matter which is different from the substance of the carrier. The distance between the nanoparticles is less than the wavelength of an incident electromagnetic wave.

The Geteroelectrics patent is of the 'umbrella' type used in the Russian Federation. Patent No. 2249277 covers 24 fields of scientific research, and "allows driving and transforming the electromagnetic fields, providing the production of devices with forecasting optical, electrical and magnetic properties."

The following patents on the methods and apparatuses using the Geteroelectrical peculiar properties are without parallel in the world:

  • Nanoamplifier of electromagnetic radiation (№2266596),
  • DC and AC capacitors and internally inherent elements of integral schemes (№2266585),
  • mirror (№2265870),
  • Method of generation of coherent electromagnetic radiation and dipole nanolaser on its base (№2249278),
  • Optical glass (№2209785)
  • Photocathode (№2216815)
  • Geterogen photoelement (№2217845)
  • Photoelement (№2222846)

The optical glass made with Geteroelectric is claimed to have ten times the index of refraction -- a record.

Presently, the weak application of solar energy is due to the following insufficiencies:

  • Low efficiency of light conversion into the electrical current (not more 20%).
  • No possibility to receive electric power at night, on cloudy days, or within a country with a dark season of short days with low-intensity sunlight (or none, as in the Arctic).
  • Absence of high effectiveness, and an ecological safe source of energy accumulation (presently acid accumulators [battery] are used).

None of the above-mentioned insufficiencies is present in the STAR Battery.

The Geteroelectrical photoelement developed by S.C.A.R. at J.I.N.R. is the main component of the STAR BATTERY which possesses the following technical and commercial advantages:

  • The efficiency of light transformation in visible range is 54% (A world record today).
  • As for infra-red light, the efficiency of reformation, it is 31% higher than the efficiency of a modern solar battery in the visible domain.
  • The photocurrent of Geteroelectrical photoelement (GEP) operates at a factor of 4x higher than the modern solar battery.
  • The GEP provides a very high efficiency in the dark and during the cloudy periods of a day.
  • It is practically on a factor of 4x higher than the modern solar battery in the visible range.
  • In the infra-red domain, it is on a factor of 2x higher than the efficiency of the modern solar battery in the visible range.
  • The mass of GEP semiconductor material needed to produce one Watt of energy is 1,000 times less than the mass needed in the existing solar photoelements.

The above information indicates that the manufacturing cost of the Geteroelectrical photoelement of the STAR BATTERY will be less than the manufacturing cost of the photoelement of a modern solar battery.

# # #

SOURCE

  • Press release received by email on May 31 from Prof. Valentin Samoilov, Director of Scientific Center of Applied Research (SCAR) at the Joint Institute of Nuclear Research

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT


Feedback

O'Bedlam's 2 cents...

Posted May 31, 2006, pm


My technical Russian is pretty rusty. I've been over some of the documents, and here is my 10,000 foot overview, prone to me going back with a grammar in hand and trying to re-verify what I'm reading.

This is pretty cool, if they've pulled it off. They're calling the class of materials "heterogenous materials", with the specific class in question "heteroelectric material". It got translated as "geteroelectric". Anyway, in the US we would normally call this a metamaterial instead of a "heterogenous material". You'll get a lot more action in Google et al if you look for "metamaterial". A note, this isn't your usual bogus Russian Pravda-online pseudo-science. This is real stuff, although there is a lot of material design work that I am betting they haven't completed. So these things are probably on the way, but I bet you they don't have them all in hand quite yet.

A metamaterial is a material that is custom designed for unnatural electromagnetic field effects. By that I mean you can choose the geometry and characteristics of the carrier material and the inclusions in order to achieve a pre-determined (this got mistranslated as "forecasting") electromagnetic characteristic, and in this case the characteristic you design for is typically the dielectric constant. Explaining that is tough; basically,a non-metallic material's electrons have a tendency to shift around the nucleus in a cloud. They don't "orbit" in the sense that you see sometimes in bad science fiction movies or really old chemistry books. They sort of hover around in a cloud. This electron cloud has a sort of elasticity and stiffness to it, if you want to visualize it that way. Some materials' electron clouds are looser, and can shift more easily, these materials are said to have a higher dielectric constant.

One of their claims is that they have invented a metamaterial capacitor with an unnaturally high dielectric constant. In a capacitor, the higher the dielectric constant of the capacitor's dielectric, the higher the capacitance will be for a given plate size and spacing. So, by using a metamaterial engineered for extremely high dielectric constants in a capacitor, you can achieve capacitors with values 100 to perhaps 1000 times the capacitance achievable with a "normal" dielectric. This is what they're calling a "stellar battery", it's a marketing sort of name for a really spectacular supercapacitor. If you thought 10F at 5V of capacitance in the palm of your hand was great, wait until you see a 100KF cap with a 50V working voltage. This will be worth it even if the other stuff falls through, and to me seems to be a "duh" sort of invention. The sort that you slap your head and say "duh" because you didn't think of it. O'Bedlam's reality rating: 9.5 out of 10.

Their other claims are for metamaterials that are not so much for altering dielectric constants as they are for engineering the behavior of the inclusions. For example, one of the claims is for constructing nanoinclusions consisting of P material while the carrier is N type material. It's like grinding up a photocell to make a zillion tiny ones. The metamaterial trick here is to amplify the sensitivity of the nanocells to a particular wavelength of light, the higher the dielectric constant of the metamaterial, the slower light travels in the material. So in effect, you're making longer IR wavelengths look shorter to the little particulate cells so that they will tend to absorb them. A neat trick, if you can pull it off, and this is one I'm more dubious about. I don't know if the "stellar cell" is hype or a demonstrable reality. O'Bedlam's reality rating: 7 out of 10...show me. I'd love it to be true, and it sounds ok in passing, but my "there's probably issues with this" alarms are going off.

Less spectacular and only mentioned in glancing was that you can make some really sweet mirrors out of this for laser use. They do bring up a metamaterial whose inclusions can be population inverted to form little lasers, with dielectric mirrors sort of "cast in" to the material. I see it as a possibility, but I think they're grasping: reality rating 4 out of 10.

The Russian materials are different in that they are engineered to increase the dielectric constant. We would typically go the other way, and when you look at what little you'll be able to find in the way of real data on US metamaterials, you'll find that we engineer for zero or negative dielectric constants. That's a really bizarre, unnatural state of affairs. If you're not into field physics you won't understand just how unnatural a zero or negative epsilon-r is. It has military implications. What I don't know is how much of Samoilov's work has already been done here and isn't in the searchable patent file. The US has spent a LOT of money on this stuff over the past 15 years. It's a hot field for the military and aerospace guys.

You may have seen some popularized stuff lately about "invisibility cloaks" and so on, this Russian material relates to that in a sort of odd way.


See also

Page posted by Sterling D. Allan May 31, 2006
Last updated June 03, 2006

 

Ads

 

NOTE: We are presently moderating all comments, to keep out the crass negativity, flaming, and other inappropriate forms of criticism. We welcome constructive criticism tactfully stated. Frequent offenders will be blacklisted.

"It is harder to crack a prejudice than an atom." // "I'd rather be an optimist and a fool than a pessimist and right."
-- Albert Einstein

ADVISORY: With any technology, you take a high risk to invest significant time or money unless (1) independent testing has thoroughly corroborated the technology, (2) the group involved has intellectual rights to the technology, and (3) the group has the ability to make a success of the endeavor.
Schopenhauer
All truth passes through three stages:
   First, it is ridiculed;
   Second, it is violently opposed; and
   Third, it is accepted as self-evident.

-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    "When you're one step ahead
of the crowd you're a genius.
When you're two steps ahead,
you're a crackpot."

-- Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, (Feb. 1998)

Submit • Privacy • About • Contact

PESWiki Departments:
Latest • News •XMLFeed • Directory • Congress • Top 5 • Open Sourcing • PowerPedia

PESN.com
Copyright © 2002-2014, PES Network Inc.